Agreed, but not that simple. There were many issues not resolved in that war. Total victory would have been better than they way it ended.
You cant subjugate a people they way Germany was after WW1 and it not blow up. You have to completely resolve differences or completely conquer then ASSIMILATE or forgive and move on.
Look at the 100 plus years of bullshit reconstruction caused after the civil war. Again I'm oversimplifying a complicated set of issues but I think the point is clear.
I don’t disagree. But the strict sanctions, requirement to pay the other nations back for the war, etc crippled the German economy and made life miserable. Probably could have gotten away with just the military restrictions.
All it took was one charismatic speaker to whip a downbeaten population in to a fury and give them people to blame. Yes, there were many factors, but most of it played in to the same end result of “blame them”. Hitler walked in and gave them someone to hate while preaching about bringing back the great Empire. So, we cripple the Russian economy for how long until the populace are 100% on board with going to war with anyone who stands in the way of bringing back the former “greatness”?
I’m not saying sanctions are completely wrong all the time, or even that they were wrong now (though they never seem to stop wars or invasions). I’m saying they can’t go on forever and there has to be a way out. Otherwise the population will suffer and that blame will end up creating hatred towards any nation taking part in the sanctions.
But I did oversimplify in my original comment. I don’t think the idea or lesson is incorrect though.