The F16 would be better for Poland than the Mig's they would be giving up.OK twin engine is only difference between an F-15 and F-16.
Gotcha.
The F16 would be better for Poland than the Mig's they would be giving up.OK twin engine is only difference between an F-15 and F-16.
Gotcha.
At one point, a US official (SedDef?) was encouraging Poland to do so. Then Poland called his bluff. Went up the US chain where Biden killed it. Editorial in the WSJ described this.
The Polish planes are original models with limited capabilities (some upgrades).
Splitting hairs."Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Sunday confirmed that the discussions"
Discussions are not offers.
"we are looking at how we might be able to backfill should Poland decide to . . . supply those planes,” Blinken said
"might be able" not an offer.
Notice who is not quoted? The only guy with legal authority to make an offer.
The F16 would be better for Poland than the Mig's they would be giving up.
The F16 would be better for Poland than the Mig's they would be giving up.
Splitting hairs.
Admit you were wrong.
Just read an article that one of the Russian missile systems has a countermeasures rocket it releases. Chaff, perhaps jamming capability as well. Can't remember where I read the article.Flares on Russian helicopters are nothing new. It’s a pretty basic and boring defensive measure that doesn’t get talked about much, but not an advanced defensive system. Hinds we’re getting their asses kicked by Stingers we have to afghans in the 70s and the Russians adapted. Flares are no guarantee either.
I’d be surprised to see actual electronic counter measures on a cruise missile, likely very short range and unable to prevent an initial lock. It typically takes a dedicated aircraft to handle that role. Chaff and flare may or may not be effective, especially if the missile isn’t taking evasive maneuvers to avoid the strike.
HARMs are for hitting active radar, not cruise missiles.
Not telling what our real missile defense systems are capable of. Probably either substantially better or worse than anything the gov might admit. If you tell someone your true capabilities they will know exactly how to defeat them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And the basis for that assumption?Not sure how many are actually 100% ready. Probably very few if any.
Jesus Christ. They're some of the most modern MiG-29s out there.
And the basis for that assumption?
"Some" hits on civilians are simply a result of bad intel, tech that didn't work or human error.Just reporting what I am seeing on Telegram.
I have videos saved to my phone of Ukrainian missiles decimating civilians in Donetsk. Are you outraged about that too?
They need a DeLorean so they can go back in time and unphuck this mess. The utter destruction that is being laid on them is horrifying.IMO Ukraine needs attack helicopters, not jets. The Ukrainians have plenty of anti-aircraft missiles which are proving to be very effective.
They need a DeLorean so they can go back in time and unphuck this mess. The utter destruction that is being laid on them is horrifying.
Thank you, Capt. Obvious. Tell us something we don't know.No Air Force is 100%. I think F-18 is only 80%, and that does not mean all flight systems working.
Ward Carroll covers this in his youtube videos. Great channel. he recounts how several times he went up without systems working. One time his entire radar did not work. All they had was guns.
Yes, a DeLorean with a flux capacitor would by far be the best option.
Thank you, Capt. Obvious. Tell us something we don't know.
"Very few" is a long way from 80%.