Breaking news shots fired at trump rally

[General Zod]

If we have a secret service that’s refusing to protect trump then they are neither incompetent or negligent. That’s a deliberate decision, and if coupled with prior knowledge of threats against trump then it’s complicit.

If it's an official policy, then yes. If it's personal behavior by personnel and not a group action in coordination, then no. We do not have a Secret Service that is refusing to protect him (though they did refuse to protect RFK Jr for a while). We have individuals who are shirking their responsibilities and contributing to a culture of complacency and carelessness.

 

[Havok1]

The existence of a conspiracy to assassinate a President requires concrete proof. Not the conjecture everyone's throwing around.

I’m sure the same people who couldn’t figure out who brought coke into the White House will conduct a very thorough investigation into it.

 

[General Zod]

I’m sure the same people who couldn’t figure out who brought coke into the White House will conduct a very thorough investigation into it.

And finally you hit on something we agree on. Only took a couple of years.

 

[cycleguy2300]

If we have a secret service that’s refusing to protect trump then they are neither incompetent or negligent. That’s a deliberate decision, and if coupled with prior knowledge of threats against trump then it’s complicit.

Being bad or neglectful at your job doesn't mean the result was malicious, though I suspect there was a lot of "**** him, who cares" when it came to resource allocation for Trump.

Whether malicious neglect or simply an inability to plan and perform, the result was the same and the correction needed is almost identical. People need to be fired swiftly and face charges for their dereliction of duty.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[cycleguy2300]

Johnny Diamond asked me to post the YOUTUBE video, it wasnt working for him. I hadn't watched but saw it being touted on Instagram hadn't had a chance to post the link or watch it.





Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[Johnny Diamond]

I hadn't seen much of the video before I tried to post without success and forwarded it to cycleguy2300 interesting.
Thank you sir.
Johnny

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

 

[Eastexasrick]

Cub Scout meetings are better planned.
Said it before.
Ignorance, arrogance, and hubris imbedded in the command structure, all the way to the top. Which was on graphic display when DEI hire, Kimberly was unable to answer the simplest questions.

 

[Havok1]

“”

Being bad or neglectful at your job doesn't mean the result was malicious, though I suspect there was a lot of "**** him, who cares" when it came to resource allocation for Trump.

Whether malicious neglect or simply an inability to plan and perform, the result was the same and the correction needed is almost identical. People need to be fired swiftly and face charges for their dereliction of duty.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

If someone intentionally allows vulnerabilities in a security plan for the purpose of hoping a threat will circumvent it, then that is not being bad, or neglectful at their job, and is very much malicious.

And no, the same correction is not required for someone being incompetent as corrupt. Not even close. The secret service also didn’t just magically forget how to do what they do every day.

 

[Johnny Diamond]

My opinions on this topic have previously been stated, and don't need repeating I've been waiting for a video by someone I trusted and that had a large following and decent reputation for research, to post and walk away from,
Chew on it for a while and decide for yourselves.
Johnny

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

 

[cycleguy2300]

“”


If someone intentionally allows vulnerabilities in a security plan for the purpose of hoping a threat will circumvent it, then that is not being bad, or neglectful at their job, and is very much malicious.

And no, the same correction is not required for someone being incompetent as corrupt. Not even close. The secret service also didn’t just magically forget how to do what they do every day.

That's a lot of assumptions made without facts to back them up, but when have you ever let reason get in the way of emotion...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[Havok1]

That's a lot of assumptions made without facts to back them up, but when have you ever let reason get in the way of emotion...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

Assuming the secret service forgot how to do their job overnight is an assumption. But when have you ever let reason get in the way of emotion…

 

[cycleguy2300]

Assuming the secret service forgot how to do their job overnight is an assumption. But when have you ever let reason get in the way of emotion…

There you go again...

Twisting words and misrepresenting positions is a given with you. Why does manipulation and a need for control motivate you so much?

Did I say I thought this was the result of overnight failures or are you just assuming???

This was the result of systemic failure of culture within the USSS because of woke, leftist policies and practices.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[Lead Belly]

Not sure if it's been mentioned, but:

Lisa Struck was paid $800,000 and Peter Strzok was paid $1.2 Million by DOJ link.

They were the agents who texted "FBI will stop Trump from being in office" link

Kennedy asked who at FBI signed off on lawsuit settlement; Kennedy could not get name of responsible party link

 

[Havok1]

There you go again...

Twisting words and misrepresenting positions is a given with you. Why does manipulation and a need for control motivate you so much?

Did I say I thought this was the result of overnight failures or are you just assuming???

This was the result of systemic failure of culture within the USSS because of woke, leftist policies and practices.

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

that’s the opinion of someone who also thinks the shooter couldn’t be seen because he stayed below the ridgeline.

 

[Mohawk600]

Keepin' my favorite thread at the top

 

[cycleguy2300]

that’s the opinion of someone who also thinks the shooter couldn’t be seen because he stayed below the ridgeline.

I dont think that.

Why would you lie about what I think?

You are continually vexatious even when you are not outright lying and trolling

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[Havok1]

I dont think that.

Why would you lie about what I think?

You are continually vexatious even when you are not outright lying and trolling

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

gotcha. I guess you either changed your opinion in the last couple pages or expect that others haven’t/wont see your posts.

 

[cycleguy2300]

gotcha. I guess you either changed your opinion in the last couple pages or expect that others haven’t/wont see your posts.

Just go away.

Your guesses and assumptions add nothing

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[popper]

Just out- boss at SS tried to get the coke baggie destroyed. Supposed to be kept as evidence for 3 years. Toss under the tin foil hat.

 

[roadkill]

Or toss onto the sloped roof