Its still funnyRead the disclaimer before getting panties in a wad.
It's still funny
Remember the parable of the widow and the mite? Libtards would say yeah so, it's just a mite....while the point was it was everything the widow had.Ryan McBeth was completely correct in his discussion about Patriot missles and the funds that pay for them. You presented no data to contradict him
The scope of the conversation was was about Patriot missles, not other funding.
As you can see the largest portion of funding for Ukraine is weapons and equipment (Patriots, javelins etc) from our stocks that are approaching expiration.
And for those that will knee-jerk and say "Europe's problem, they should deal with it" Europe has been reaching much deeper into their pockets that we have.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Thanks.According to Brave's AI summarizer:
Summarizer
Since February 2022, the United States has allocated $113.4 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine in wartime.1 The aid has been divided into six categories: support of US military forces, shipment of US equipment to Ukraine, weapons procurement and services for the Ukrainian armed forces, humanitarian relief, economic support to the Ukrainian government, and US government agencies.0 Congress has given the Biden administration considerable flexibility in when and how it can spend the $113 billion that has been allocated. The US has spent nearly $44 billion on military aid for Ukraine, according to the State Department.2 The Kiel Institute for the World Economy reports that the US had committed nearly $80 billion in aid to Ukraine before Mr. Biden's pledge in Ukraine this week.3
It's quoted sources, dated variously in 2023, are:
breakingdefense.com
0
usafacts.org
1
nytimes.com
2
bbc.com
3
***
You're welcome.
We give the crumbs from our table, literally the scraps to Ukraine.Remember the parable of the widow and the mite? Libtards would say yeah so, it's just a mite....while the point was it was everything the widow had.
No matter how much European nations give, proportionally some will always say so.... is that all?
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
We give the crumbs from our table, literally the scraps to Ukraine.
.32% of our gpd... 1/3 of 1%Except they're not crumbs.
They're hard earned dollars scraped off our backs.
Whether served domestically or globally,
there's not much left of us to fund a feast.
Always moving the goalpostslol. It seems you just want to argue with me more than anything. You didnt provide data, therefore im not saying your data is wrong. I said the guy on Instagram that you shared was wrong. And he is. You also did not even say I was wrong. You just said I didn’t post data. We all know that what I said is correct.
here we have a graph that includes funding that we send to Ukraine to pay the salaries and pensions of the ukranian government. See? I knew you weren’t that clueless. He did not specify that just the Patriot missiles are being taken out of service and being sent to Ukraine. Although that may be correct, when he started off his little speech saying “I’m going to say this louder for those in the back” and then proceeded to say how we aren’t just pushing pallets of cash out of the back of c17s, the accuracy of that statement lies in the fact that we are likely sending that money electronically, not on c17s. And when he attempts to talk about “what happens when we authorize money for Ukraine ” he talks about the process, seemingly clueless of the fact that we are, and have been using our tax dollars to purchase brand new equipment for Ukraine.Ryan McBeth was completely correct in his discussion about Patriot missles and the funds that pay for them. You presented no data to contradict him
The scope of the conversation was was about Patriot missles, not other funding.
As you can see the largest portion of funding for Ukraine is weapons and equipment (Patriots, javelins etc) from our stocks that are approaching expiration.
And for those that will knee-jerk and say "Europe's problem, they should deal with it" Europe has been reaching much deeper into their pockets that we have.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Always moving the goalposts
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
You could be right, but without data, your statements are as useless as a third tit...here we have a graph that includes funding that we send to Ukraine to pay the salaries and pensions of the ukranian government. See? I knew you weren’t that clueless. He did not specify that just the Patriot missiles are being taken out of service and being sent to Ukraine. Although that may be correct, when he started off his little speech saying “I’m going to say this louder for those in the back” and then proceeded to say how we aren’t just pushing pallets of cash out of the back of c17s, the accuracy of that statement lies in the fact that we are likely sending that money electronically, not on c17s. And when he attempts to talk about “what happens when we authorize money for Ukraine ” he talks about the process, seemingly clueless of the fact that we are, and have been using our tax dollars to purchase brand new equipment for Ukraine.
the goal posts aren’t moving. You’re just not as good as you think you are.
you posted the graph. if you understand the information on it then you know that I’m right.You could be right, but without data, your statements are as useless as a third tit...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
I'm not in disagreement that some of the non-military aid has gone towards making sure the government and hospitals run day-to-day. Keeping basic governmental infrastructure running is as important as making sure troops get fed, paid, trained and equipped.you posted the graph. if you understand the information on it then you know that I’m right.
But maybe I am wrong, and the information on the state department, and DOD websites, is all just Russian propaganda. Of course that would also mean that your graph is wrong if that were the case.
YOU presented the data that showed he was incorrect on the money, and at best was misleading about the military aid funding. Judging by the comments, most of the people who saw the video knew better.I'm not in disagreement that some of the non-military aid has gone towards making sure the government and hospitals run day-to-day. Keeping basic governmental infrastructure running is as important as making sure troops get fed, paid, trained and equipped.
Glad you were able to understand the pictures like I hoped.
You still haven't presented any data to show McBeth was incorrect. He was talking specifically about Patriot missiles and if you need more pictures to understand that I can borrow my kids crayons...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk