Either way, it's bad info. There is absolutely no distinction in the law as to what monetary value of the items being stolen must be reached to the use of lethal force. I'll save you the time, in Texas it will most likely result in a 'No Bill' from the Grand Jury. If you can find a current example of case law that showed otherwise, I'd be interested in seeing it but I think you'd be hard pressed to find one.
Still, I'm impressed that you can clearly distinguish between some kids simply stealing junk food and others with more nefarious intentions. Sounds like something from Minority Report!
Did you watch the video? The one I saw showed a bunch of teens ganking snacks in a convienience store while smiling and whatnot. Are you implying that if such an event were to take place and you happened to be in that store at the time, you would peel ol' roscoe and go to work? For one, its not your store, two, those kids werent posing any immidiate bodily harm. Im not saying those punk ass teens were right in what they were doing, what I will say is that for somone to actually believe that such a thing warrants a death sentence, or that they would go about shooting, makes me wonder about some of you. I would certainly leave the store and call 5-0, but unless one of them decided to cross the line with me, roscoe would stay holstered, and I would just leave. Ill work on finding out where I got that $2,500 number from, but I will say that it is certain that you will spend alot more than that for legal defense if you just go around capping kids for lifting "Ho-Ho's".