I am also interested in the Dagger. I do not own a 9, looks like a contender. The Rock 556 doesn't interest me at the moment.I acquired a GF3 in trade and am happy with it. I have a couple of their ar15 uppers and am equally content with them. I've been jonesing for one of their daggers but only if it was in .40 S&W. In hindsight, as I typed that thought out I realized some may question my judgement outright for being a .40 fan.
They are also making ammo now at reasonable prices. For the record I do own a couple of their "No Beto" lowers.
I am also interested in the Dagger. I do not own a 9, looks like a contender. The Rock 556 doesn't interest me at the moment.
Beto isn't tired of losing yet so there's always the chance they do another run of them.I missed out on that one.
There are three meme lowers I'd love to have.
***K Cancer
Mad Dog
No Beto
the "AR-14" joe lower is pretty funny. Has "dog faced pony soldier" on it.
I have several Daggers in different sizes as well, and while I have had problems with Magpul mags in regular Glocks, they run fine in all my Daggers. Another reason to buy PSA.The Dagger is good to go. I have a few of them. I would buy a frame when they were on sale. Wait until slides were on sale and get one. I'm not a big fan of the Magpul magazines but I have enough Glock mags to make do.
I got one of their FJB lower receivers. Haven't built anything with it yet.
You don’t say, I didn’t know that they made such a treasure. Got a pic?
I’d like to get one too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You don’t say, I didn’t know that they made such a treasure. Got a pic?
I’d like to get one too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
ah damn. I passed because let's go Nascar theme was just ok. The selector markings are awesome
ah damn. I passed because let's go Nascar theme was just ok. The selector markings are awesome
a lot of colt guns in the 60s, 70s, 80's, and 90's tended to be made with whatever was left over in the factory, so you have SP1s with full fence lowers and sporter iis with slab side lowers, many variations of upper ect ect, but I feel bushmaster back in the day was a pretty good way to get an AR15 in ye olden times, of course you had SGW, which then turned to Oly Arms later in life. and a few other smaller manufacturers that made AR15s.I don't think i agree. Older colts, for all the stupid stuff they did, large pin lowers, takedown pins, sear blocks, and semi BCG's, all shoot fantastically. Colt knows how to make a fantastic AR barrel and that isn't something Bushmaster was ever able to step to Colt with. There's other stuff, things like proper HPT/MPI on bolts, proper gas port size, gas key/castle nut staking, extractor spring inserts, etc.
You are correct about Colt, but bushmaster missed a lot of stuff that really shouldn't be misseda lot of colt guns in the 60s, 70s, 80's, and 90's tended to be made with whatever was left over in the factory, so you have SP1s with full fence lowers and sporter iis with slab side lowers, many variations of upper ect ect, but I feel bushmaster back in the day was a pretty good way to get an AR15 in ye olden times, of course you had SGW, which then turned to Oly Arms later in life. and a few other smaller manufacturers that made AR15s.
my "period correct" retro gun is built off bushmaster parts, lower and upper with some more modern parts thrown in the mix for smooth operation.
View attachment 395977
the company that was worse about not staking was probably DPMS tbh, all the vintage bushmasters ive seen and owned had staked gas keys.You are correct about Colt, but bushmaster missed a lot of stuff that really shouldn't be missed
Which would you rather have? A slab side lower with some weird dimensions or an unsealed, unstaked BCG that wasn't hpt/mpi'd? We can pick and choose and fix all that now, but back then things weren't so easy.
Bushmaster made some good stuff, but they also got a lot of stuff wrong.