News About The Ukraine War

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • zackmars

    Novice Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Nov 4, 2015
    7,036
    96
    Texas
    WSJ reports that Russia is using electronic countermeasures to negate some advance weapons.

    The Excalibur artillery round performed wonders when it was introduced into the Ukrainian battlefield in the summer of 2022. Guided by GPS, the shells hit Russian tanks and artillery with surgical precision, as drones overhead filmed the resulting fireballs. That didn’t last.

    Within weeks, the Russian army started to adapt, using its formidable electronic warfare capabilities. It managed to interfere with the GPS guidance and fuzes, so that the shells would either go astray, fail to detonate, or both. By the middle of last year, the M982 Excalibur munitions, became essentially useless and are no longer employed, Ukrainian commanders say.

    Several other weapons that showcased the West’s technological superiority have encountered a similar fate. Russian electronic countermeasures have significantly reduced the precision of GPS-guided missiles fired by Himars systems, the weapon credited for reversing the momentum of the war in Ukraine’s favor in the summer of 2022, Ukrainian military officials say.
    A brand-new system, the Ground-Launched Small Diameter Bomb munition has failed altogether after its introduction in recent months, in part because of Russian electronic warfare. It is no longer in use in Ukraine pending an overhaul.

    Good old fashioned artillery still works, though.

    U.S. and European manufacturers are being slow to upgrade their systems to stay ahead of Russian countermeasures.
    Excalibur was developed in 1992.

    To invoke the Raytheon guy, "we keep our good stuff secret then decide where we use it and who we show it off too"
     

    wiredgeorge

    Older than I was yesterday!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 10, 2010
    2,176
    96
    Mico TX
    Guess the potato gave a speech yesterday at the NATO conference and said we are going to give Ukraine a bunch more tactical air defense systems. Said a "security agreement" had been signed with Ukraine and 20 something other countries. Is that like signing a treaty? Doesn't congress need to jump in on those type things? The leader of the free world?

     

    Johnny Diamond

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 6, 2022
    5,324
    96
    US
    The wording stipulates congress will agree to treaties (I'm a few glasses into some home made apple wine) so don't hold me to exact wording, no one else has the authority, however legal documents are funny things what they say and how they are referred to "specifically" matter a whole lot!

    Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
     

    zackmars

    Novice Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Nov 4, 2015
    7,036
    96
    Texas
    We supplied them to Ukraine from our stocks.

    Yes and no. The GLSDB has three major parts. The M26 rocket, which is considered obsolete by military standards (developed in 1980). The SDB which started development in 2001, and is currently in US inventory and service as the GBU-39/B, and then there's the adapter that was designed by Boeing/SAAB.

    We wouldn't use the GLSDB because we're trying to get rid of our M26 rockets since 2009, and any capabilities the GLSDB has is more than matched by ATACMS.

    Seems like the GLSDB is more or less a stopgap solution for people looking for a cheap SSM who don't want to drop a million per ATACMS or 2 mil per storm shadow.
     

    General Zod

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 29, 2012
    29,255
    96
    Kaufman County

    oldag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 19, 2015
    18,389
    96
    Yes and no. The GLSDB has three major parts. The M26 rocket, which is considered obsolete by military standards (developed in 1980). The SDB which started development in 2001, and is currently in US inventory and service as the GBU-39/B, and then there's the adapter that was designed by Boeing/SAAB.

    We wouldn't use the GLSDB because we're trying to get rid of our M26 rockets since 2009, and any capabilities the GLSDB has is more than matched by ATACMS.

    Seems like the GLSDB is more or less a stopgap solution for people looking for a cheap SSM who don't want to drop a million per ATACMS or 2 mil per storm shadow.
    The U.S. has pursued a strategy of "cutting edge" (using that in DOD terms) technology which is expensive and used in smaller quantities. There is something to still to be said for cheap munitions in large quantities.
     

    zackmars

    Novice Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Nov 4, 2015
    7,036
    96
    Texas
    The U.S. has pursued a strategy of "cutting edge" (using that in DOD terms) technology which is expensive and used in smaller quantities. There is something to still to be said for cheap munitions in large quantities.

    There's something to be said for cheap munitions in large quantities if that's what your military demands.

    Ukraine struggles with this because US aide has strings attached. They aren't allowed to strike at strategic targets inside russian territory with US weapons, which is exactly what they are designed for. This is in addition to being a former Soviet satellite, and all the training, culture, and equipment that entails.

    Meanwhile the Russians HAVE to have an edge in mass artillery and armor formations because they lack the capability, knowledge, and expertise to reliably target critical military infrastructure.
     

    General Zod

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 29, 2012
    29,255
    96
    Kaufman County
    There's something to be said for cheap munitions in large quantities if that's what your military demands.

    Ukraine struggles with this because US aide has strings attached. They aren't allowed to strike at strategic targets inside russian territory with US weapons, which is exactly what they are designed for. This is in addition to being a former Soviet satellite, and all the training, culture, and equipment that entails.

    Meanwhile the Russians HAVE to have an edge in mass artillery and armor formations because they lack the capability, knowledge, and expertise to reliably target critical military infrastructure.

    They can reliably target hospitals, train stations and apartment blocks though.
     

    wiredgeorge

    Older than I was yesterday!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 10, 2010
    2,176
    96
    Mico TX

    cycleguy2300

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 19, 2010
    7,978
    96
    Austin, Texas
    They can reliably target hospitals, train stations and apartment blocks though.
    Ryan McBeth was pointing outrussia may be trying to creat a dilemma for Ukraine's limited anti-air resources, forcing them to move protection from legitimate military targets like airfields, industry and warehouses, to protect schools, hospitals and shopping malls.

    I tend to think this will backfire and provoke nations to increase their supply of air defense, and probably spur tightened economic sanctions if not more.

    Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
     

    oldag

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 19, 2015
    18,389
    96
    Ryan McBeth was pointing outrussia may be trying to creat a dilemma for Ukraine's limited anti-air resources, forcing them to move protection from legitimate military targets like airfields, industry and warehouses, to protect schools, hospitals and shopping malls.

    I tend to think this will backfire and provoke nations to increase their supply of air defense, and probably spur tightened economic sanctions if not more.

    Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
    I am not sure enough air defense supplies exist.
     
    Top Bottom