Is that a positive or a negative?
Oh thank God! Lol! Why in the world are they not required to promote from within?I'd call it a negative. Cheetos and soda vs the leaders of the free world
I personally don't think it is him, but....I may eat crow.Same brow, hair line, hair color, holes in ear.
The one photo is missing a hole in the back of his head, but I think its pretty new.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Agree.
Two things I'd like your take on.
1. One witness said it sounded like the two groups of shots came from different directions and that the second group sounded more powerful. This supports your big money bet. Agree?
2. To me, repeatedly listening to the gunfire, there seemed to be less than 2 seconds between groups. Is that enough time for the LE snipers to hear the shots, turn, find & spot the shooter and end him? I sure hope so, cause if it's not that means he was in their scopes before he pulled the trigger. Thoughts?
Thanks.
I blame God for making stupid people.I blame the Chinese. They invented gunpowder. The entire world was nothing but flowers and kittens before guns came about and nobody was ever killed.
His entire S.S. Detail should be fired. Any WIPS contract that had something like this happen would have the same outcome.1. First 3? Shots were suspect second fusilade (5?) was counter-snipers making him dead. They were in different locations so its natural for it to sound like they were.
2. 2-seconds seems reasonable for trained and skilled shooters to return fire at 130m? When , set up on tripods. They would need to see the threat, (no shots yet) possibly try to see whats up through their glass, take fire, then return fire.
The building the shooter was on, the building the CST was on and maybe a building to the south were all obvious positions to deny any potential shooter at all costs. The SS cant lock down three rooftops? They screwed the pooch big time. I 100% believe it was luck and failures, not anything more nefarious, but the end result is the President was shot and nearly killed.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
The SS screwed up. They did not have that rooftop completely covered.Back side of a rooftop. Crawl up and take a shot. Probably not visible until just prior to firing.
Should they have kept their heads on a swivel, you know, looking around instead of in oneCounter sniper seems to be facing forward...same direction as Trump. Shooter was about 45 degrees to sniper's right. Probably on the backslope of the roof, then slowly crawled to the peak to shoot over the top at Trump. Drone or overhead helo would have spotted the shooter sooner.
For those interested.............
Someone else who saw him on the roof.
Should they have kept their heads on a swivel, you know, looking around instead of in one
direction...straight ahead?
Here's the BBC interview, pretty damning.
Who gets the patsy's pension?Post-neutralized, the shirt does appear to be one of Matt's brandings on the kid. The flag lines up on the right sleeve.
Ahh remember the parallax view with Warren Beatty?I keep reading in news reports and hearing it on TV that the shooter has not been identified. Yet the shooter was idetified early on as Jacqui Henrich as reported on FoxnNews.com. Somehow though Fox is now saying the shooter has not been ID'd.
Here is what they said about the shooter having been ID'd early on:
" A law enforcement source told Fox News' Jacqui Henrich the shooter is dead and two additional casualties are being taken to Pittsburgh hospital."
Here is some hot stuff for a conspiracy theory, if you do an Internet search of that name you discover a person named Jacqui Heinrich (slightly different spelling Heinrich instead of Henrich) is:
"Jacqui Heinrich is an American journalist, news anchor and Senior White House Correspondent for Fox News.[1][2]" (source).
Let the conspiracy theorists disect that.