So, a plea of not guilty has been entered and there's a question as to whether he should get a public defender. Mildly interesting, at best, but the article is a good summary for folks new to this thread.
You have to put an email address to read.Interesting. Not for me.
Washingtonpost.com doesn't need to have my email address. I get too much junk mail to delete everyday without their contributions.I just went back to look, prepared to put in my email, and didn't need to .
I was able to read it now.
I have a 2nd email I use to sign on to crappy websites like theirsWashingtonpost.com doesn't need to have my email address. I get too much junk mail to delete everyday without their contributions.
Washingtonpost.com doesn't need to have my email address. I get too much junk mail to delete everyday without their contributions.
No, you're right about that. No new info there. I only linked to it because, given the passage of a little time, the summary presented therein was much more straightforward than I'd previously seen.I don't really think there was any new information, maybe I'm wrong.
...I went back to it. I intended to blockquote a couple of paragraphs here so people could stop talking about the paywall and actually see the reason I thought it was worth visiting.Maybe someone could quote pertinent parts of the article?