NSFW: Super Post Whore Thread v2.0

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

So gifting, versus sending dad in with money to buy it for him because he can't, is the same?

It would be in the Dad's name as the Son cannot legally purchase either way, source of the money wouldn't matter I would think. I believe the gift rule is Maternal to a Son, Paternal to a Daughter? I thought I read that somewhere and probably look like a Dolt even saying it here in Tx. Was something I read or miss/remember possibly.

 

[ZX9RCAM]

It would be in the Dad's name as the Son cannot legally purchase either way, source of the money wouldn't matter I would think. I believe the gift rule is Maternal to a Son, Paternal to a Daughter? I thought I read that somewhere and probably look like a Dolt even saying it here in Tx. Was something I read or miss/remember possibly.

Same with any straw purchase.
Source proves it's not a gift.

 

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

I would hold the gun in trust as a parent, and he can use it in a legal way.

No matter what the law may say, in an age where a Derek Chauvin can go to prison for murder, and from the videos there is no way you can convince me he was trying to kill Floyd, which murder implies. I have little trust in the justice system.

That's the most legal/protected way I would think, Trust it.

 

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

Same with any straw purchase.

No because he can legally be in possession of it, the kid is not Prohibited from owning, just purchasing it due to age. And again, assuming you are the legal Parent/Guardian.

 

[Axxe55]

If a parent buys a gun for their underage child, using the child's money, is that a straw purchase?

imo technically by legal definitions i would say the atf would consider it to be one!

 

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

imo technically by legal definitions i would say the atf would consider it to be one!

Is the money actually the Childs'? What if it is his allowance that he saved that came from the Parent, who is buying it?

 

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

I think a case could be made if the buyer was buying a firearm for the random kid down the street with his allowance money, and then giving him the rifle. You would have a straw purchase in regards to him not being able to buy it due to legallity of age.

But legality of age and source money is moot when it is the legal parent that is legally able to purchase it, buying it for the kid in the parents name*.

*Not a lawyer!*

 

[Axxe55]

Is the money actually the Childs'? What if it is his allowance that he saved that came from the Parent, who is buying it?

not for sure but as a teen ager my father bought us several guns with money we saved up to byuy a gun i'm sure i'm not the only one!

 

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

The source money is still the Parents in legal theory if the kid cannot buy a gun, and is under 18. Hence legal title Parent/Guardian/Conservator.

 

[Texasgordo]

I would hold the gun in trust as a parent, and he can use it in a legal way.

No matter what the law may say, in an age where a Derek Chauvin can go to prison for murder, and from the videos there is no way you can convince me he was trying to kill Floyd, which murder implies. I have little trust in the justice system.

Speaking of George Floyd.....I don't know if you know the latest news.

 

[ZX9RCAM]

The source money is still the Parents in legal theory if the kid cannot buy a gun, and is under 18. Hence legal title Parent/Guardian/Conservator.

He said he made the money working over the summer.
Why would that be the parents money?

ETA: This is what I'm going off of.
Didn't want to do it direct quote, so copy and paste.

"15 years old
Dad had to pick it up for me due to my age.
Worked all summer long to earn the money. "

 

[Texas_Lone_Ranger]

He said he made the money working over the summer.
Why would that be the parents money?

ETA: This is what I'm going off of.
Didn't want to do it direct quote, so copy and paste.

"15 years old
Dad had to pick it up for me due to my age.
Worked all summer long to earn the money. "

Laws are continually fluid and changing these days. A child now has to give permission to a healthcare provider or the Dr. for them to release medical information to the parent. So with that I do not know anymore considering the legal blanket of custody seems parsed.

Going off the qoute you presented, it to me would be up to a Prosecuter to decide if a straw-purchase by legal definition (that law was written to combat mexican cartels and U.S Citizens procuring them guns) fits.

 

[TxStetson]

 

[ZX9RCAM]

At least we're not name calling, or derailing a thread.

If there ever was a place to kill a horse, it's here.....

 

[easy rider]

View attachment 411627

That's not signed and dated, therefore not legally binding, beat the horse some more.

 

[seeker_two]

If there ever was a place to kill a horse, it's here.....

We're equipped for that....

 

[Byrd666]

Kool, I need some new paintbrushes, and the kid around the corner really, really needs a new bow for his fiddle.

 

[popsgarland]

And here's my new arrival and it came intact.

Again. Thanks Mr and Mrs @no2gates

 

[General Zod]

Well, I spent the morning and a chunk on the afternoon hauling cut limbs off from my mother in law's yard where 1/3 of her pecan tree came crashing down a couple of weeks ago, then I came home, put the trailer up, got showered and dressed in clean clothes to hit the volunteer fire department's fish fry, then stumbled home to finally recover from the work this morning.

So. I'm finally here. I'd ask what I missed, but after reading that "gift or straw purchase" conversation...I'll just sit over here and relax.

 

[ZX9RCAM]

Except, there was no gift.
Nobody said it was a gift....