Well...Lets see how honest the FBI really is *Tries to keep a straight face*
So third party NICS denies a check...Ok. FFL provides personal info...Well lets think about this. So the same information on that 4473 and that's been entered and sent over to NICS; they need the FFL to do what NICS and the FBI can do because they already have that information from the bg check done. I tell ya guys...Nothing pisses me off more than people who pawn off work. Get the FFL to do as much leg work as possible. It's like local PD's that hire stupid shits that don't want to do anything and the locals have to do the leg work to make a case happen. I'm getting done with people...I really am.
Ok...So a local agency is informed. Ordered to go? Ok they go out for a visit. Assuming the local agency is running on all cylinders, if they can't determine if the attempted buyer is truly a prohibited person, then will the local agency be allowed to give a disposition back to NICS/FBI? Watch that they won't be...I bet you.
So third party NICS denies a check...Ok. FFL provides personal info...Well lets think about this. So the same information on that 4473 and that's been entered and sent over to NICS; they need the FFL to do what NICS and the FBI can do because they already have that information from the bg check done. I tell ya guys...Nothing pisses me off more than people who pawn off work. Get the FFL to do as much leg work as possible. It's like local PD's that hire stupid shits that don't want to do anything and the locals have to do the leg work to make a case happen. I'm getting done with people...I really am.
Ok...So a local agency is informed. Ordered to go? Ok they go out for a visit. Assuming the local agency is running on all cylinders, if they can't determine if the attempted buyer is truly a prohibited person, then will the local agency be allowed to give a disposition back to NICS/FBI? Watch that they won't be...I bet you.