I find it hard to what if about laws of another state.
I doubt it's any worse than what Washington state considers an assault weapon.A friend in IL just sent this to me...
*****
It's worse than even what you saw in the video. Their definition of "assault weapons" is the most aggressive I have seen actually get passed into law. My Taurus TX-22 .22lr pistol is an "assault weapon" under their law. There is no exclusion for rimfire and Taurus was nice enough to ship all of them with threaded barrels. It is pretty much the same feature list approach as the old ban with a few new twists and a shift to any single "bad" feature makes it an assault weapon instead of the old two "bad" features. Pistols and shotguns have their own assault weapon definitions under this stupid law. The mags are 16 rounders which will also be a no-no. Pump shotguns with multiple cylinders like the KSG are out. Rifle mags will be capped at 10 rounds, pistol at 15.
They did have to compromise away harsh penalties for being caught with an oversize magazine ( was going to be a felony ). Now it's a misdemeanor if you are caught with them in public.
I believe the whole being caught in possession of any accessory that is part of their "bad" features list in your possession is a felony. So if you have a stock flash suppressor you took off a rifle and threw in a drawer somewhere because it wasn't important - that's enough to put you away.
I hate this state.
***********
No, states rights over the people are limited by the BoR. Neither States or Fed has the right to infring... unless we sit back let them. That's the "why" in progressive; slow gradual indoctrination until it's no longer questioned.It's the state, it can do what it wants...
However, I feel the likelihood of that happening is very slim to nil.
Until the Bluing....It's the state, it can do what it wants...
However, I feel the likelihood of that happening is very slim to nil.
FFLs don't send their forms to the Govt. They are required to keep them for so many years. If they go out of business, then they have to send their files to the Govt.If you bought it legally (4573) they know who you are.
That's what is said but do you believe everything they tell you? Let's say your gun is used in a crime, you don't think they will come to your door if you bought it?FFLs don't send their forms to the Govt. They are required to keep them for so many years. If they go out of business, then they have to send their files to the Govt.
Yeah, but it's smoke and mirrors. The government doesn't keep a registry (except old records and closed FFLs), but it does require the FFLs to keep a registry that the government has access to at any time. Serial number trace request to manufacturer/distributors then falls to FFLs.FFLs don't send their forms to the Govt. They are required to keep them for so many years. If they go out of business, then they have to send their files to the Govt.
Sorry, not following... got more words?Until the Bluing....
Joe
The whole Texas turning blue-state thing...Sorry, not following... got more words?
Right. Thanks.The whole Texas turning blue-state thing...
Joe