Doesn't have the balls for that.Abbott needs to do one better. He needs to withhold DPS from patrolling Austin until the DA and ADAs are fired or resigned. He also needs to order the AG and Rangers to investigate the DA for connections to blm, antifa, and Soros.
Are you CRAZY? You want equality? You want accountability? You want fairness? You want evidence not being withheld illegally?if they allowed his social media comments they should also allow the ak boy’s interview before the riot
Now I'm seeing an article on Fox News claiming that DA Garza is Soros backed and ordered investigators to hide exculpatory evidence. Apparently the case was considered closed and no charges were filed by the previous DA. Along comes Garza and reopens the case.
Soros-backed DA behind Army veteran's murder conviction accused of witness tampering, withholding evidence
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, R., criticized Soros-backed DA Jose Garza for bringing charges against an Army veteran who allegedly acted in self-defense against a BLM rioter.www.foxnews.com
No evidence was knowingly withheld from the criminal trial. That would be grounds for an immediate mistrial.Yup, we already know that Garza is a communist criminal who ordered evidence withheld, ordered a police officer to lie under oath etc. Typical leftist moves, nothing new. Move along.
When Abbott called for the pardon, it made national news. I wonder how much pressure the pardon committee is under now and how many of them fear for their lives. Imagine blms raping your whole family and burning down your house. I wonder if that's why the jury took 15 hours to deliberate on Sgt. Perry's verdict.
No evidence was knowingly withheld from the criminal trial. That would be grounds for an immediate mistrial.
Ultimately, none of us can know if Foster was pointing his weapon at Perry, or what thoughts were going through Perry’s mind just before he pulled the trigger.
I don't know for sure, but wasn't there video of the dirtbag pointing his AK at SGT Perry?
No. Not pointing at.I don't know for sure, but wasn't there video of the dirtbag pointing his AK at SGT Perry?
“Reported” okayThat's what was reported at the time, yep.
“Reported” okay
AFTER Perry drove into the crowd, Foster approached carrying his rifle at low ready.
IDGAF who the DA is or who he is supported by.And here's what's reported currently. By a notably left-leaning Austin paper.
Daniel Perry's lawyers seek new trial, say excluded evidence may have proved self-defense
Lawyers for Daniel Perry requested a new trial in the death of Austin protester Garrett Foster, saying crucial evidence was excluded from trial.www.statesman.com
There's a hell of a lot of information that was excluded from the trial. But you go on buying the Soros-backed DA's line, nobody can take that from you.
Again according to everyone who was actually at the scene, unlike you or me.Oh, so you were there? You witnessed it?
IDGAF who the DA is or who he is supported by.
I was following this story closely when it happened.
Multiple eyewitness reports from people AT THE SCENE claimed Foster never pointed his rifle AT Perry.
Again according to everyone who was actually at the scene, unlike you or me.
No, just like you didn’t.And you interviewed these witnesses? Because the guy who did interview them says differently.
Possibly so. We don’t know for certain, do we?Well, depending on when they were asked and by who...