Protestor gunned down in Austin - Daniel Perry trial
- Thread starter craigntx
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I wish.
TEXAS PENAL CODE
TITLE 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
SUBCHAPTER C. PROTECTION OF PERSONS
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE.
TITLE 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
SUBCHAPTER C. PROTECTION OF PERSONS
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE.
(a) Except as provided in Subsection (b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment;
(B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
(f) For purposes of Subsection (a), in determining whether an actor described by Subsection (e) reasonably believed that the use of force was necessary, a finder of fact may not consider whether the actor failed to retreat.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 190, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Amended by:
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1 (S.B. 378), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2007.
General Zod
TGT Addict
Austin prosecutor, Austin judge, Austin jury. Liberal witnesses who changed their stories to fit the narrative. No surprise here.
cycleguy2300
TGT Addict
The def atty is on KLBJ now
Listen online or 99.7
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
Listen online or 99.7
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
Is it just me or when you se KLBJ does you mind flash to something else that's not good to talk about.
seeker_two
My posts don't count....
In addition to the pardon, Abbott should pull DPS out of the city. Let Austin burn...
General Zod
TGT Addict
It's not as if any Austin or Travis County judge would have granted that motion.
cycleguy2300
TGT Addict
The judge seems to be as much of an issue as the DA.
- wouldn't allow information showing the good communist was a federally prohibited person (as much as I disagree with that designation
- wouldn't allow the good communist street interview talking about how he carried the AK to intimidate the other side
- when a juror violated his instructions and "researched" self-defense and brought printouts talking about how the defendant must prove their actions were self-defense and justified (when it is the governments job to show the actions of the defendant where NOT self-defense) as the defense presented its case. It poisoned the minds of the jurors listening for "proof of self-defense " when none was required. The judge didn't think it was anything and that deliberation instructions would fix it
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
General Zod
TGT Addict
Ees how seestem vork, comrade.
The judge was naturally in on it. Googling some Commiefornia law where self-defense is criminalized and then spreading it as "legal advice" through the jury is a huge red flag, the jury should have been fired and the trial restarted. Or actually the defendant freed for gross unlawful misconduct of the jurors.
Yep.
General Zod
TGT Addict
Might be smarter in the long run to appeal and get it overturned, I dunno. Pity the judge will face no repercussions for his misconduct and blatant bias. He should be disbarred.
The pardon should be fairly quick as opposed to a decade or so going through the system. He could be eligible for parole before it goes through the courts
