You're quite pleasantI ain't your phucking partner.
You're quite pleasantI ain't your phucking partner.
You start 2 threads meant to start arguement and then tell someone responding to your assertions to go sit in the corner.You're quite pleasant
Do you want to live in a world where we gleefully pat each other on the back all day while our country burns?You start 2 threads meant to start arguement and then tell someone responding to your assertions to go sit in the corner.
I got one question, what bridge do you live under?
You should see my unpleasant side.
It does what I need it to with less recoil.Why are American civilians (particularly) in love with this round when there are so many more styles and sizes out there! The round was invented decades ago for combat, to be accurate at mid and longer ranges. If only more people would have instead purchased rifles chambered in different sizes, there would not be such a shortage right now. I do not own a rifle chambered in 5.56, although I have experience firing 5.56. I'm worried for my fellow countrymen who cannot purchase ammo or have to pay much higher prices.
Why would I need to go on missions to own a 5.56/.223? If it will bring down an angry 250 pound man, it will bring down 100 pound game.Yeah but how many US Civilians are going on missions that the 5.56 round was invented for?
Isn't a larger round far more desirable for close range home defense?
7mm, 8mm....That's a good question. There are some very cool carbines chambered in other sizes. I'm not an expert to say what's best for the average American consumer, all I'm saying is *I don't think 5.56 is the best*
Also there are other platforms aside from the AR.
I feel like people go online and buy an AR chambered in 5.56 as flippantly as they buy a burger or a case of beer, without putting as many hours or weeks of thought into it. Maybe I'm just a nerd that likes to do research about firearms.
Looks like we got some hard hitters around these parts
Ahhh,,,,,you must be one of those "only the established science matters" people.Working pretty well and having probability&statistics&ballistic data to back your caliber of choice are two different things.
How would you know what best suits anyone but yourself?????Do people who would be better suited by a caliber OTHER than 5.56 still purchase a rifle chambered in 5.56? I think so, yes.
Does this hinder others who are better suited with 5.56? Yes
Well,,,that's kind of what brain dead know it all trolls do.You start 2 threads meant to start arguement and then tell someone responding to your assertions to go sit in the corner.
I got one question, what bridge do you live under?
You should see my unpleasant side.
Do you want to live in a world where we gleefully pat each other on the back all day while our country burns?
I am still wondering about how that happened. A military vet friend also does not see how a single 5.56 shot caused that particular damage.Look what happened to "Lefty" from close range.
I am still wondering about how that happened. A military vet friend also does not see how a single 5.56 shot caused that particular damage.
Hydrostatic shock.I am still wondering about how that happened. A military vet friend also does not see how a single 5.56 shot caused that particular damage.
I don't think everyone that owns AR's in 556/223 are always into/hardcore about the ballistics or other platforms. That's more geared towards gun enthusiasts aka... gun nuts.People can’t even grasp what I’m saying and instead are up in arms about a personal attack on 5.56 that I never made.
Texans do not disappoint.
Please continue.
Do people who would be better suited by a caliber OTHER than 5.56 still purchase a rifle chambered in 5.56? I think so, yes.
Does this hinder others who are better suited with 5.56? Yes
You're on the wrong website.