It would be nice to have the option but would not carry openly
Still no response?
I looked for the podcast but it wasn't posted up. I'd love to hear what they had to say.
I disagree with your stance that Open Carry is a bad thing.
Sunday's July 15th show you seemed to dwell on tactical reasons not to open carry without fair descussion on the right to keep and bear arms nor any discussion on how other states are successfully letting their residents and visitors open carry with few issues you mentioned.
I'd just like to see more fair and rounded discussion on the matter. Tactically it may not be the best choice, I agree with you some there, but as an advancement of our rights to keep an bear arms I believe it makes sense to reclaim the right in Texas to open carry as other states have successfully done.
I agree Matefrio, but I take it 1 step further. Tactically, we can all have honest disagreements on whether we would OC in everyday life or certain situations if OC were legal. However, here is where I get a little upset with the people who make the claim of "I'm all for OC legally, but not tactically". For lack of a better word or phrase to describe this person, I will call them "Pro-OC with Tactical Reservations" (POCWTR). POCWTRs are starting to become the "voice of reason" that is keeping OC illegal. In fact, many POCWTRs are just anti-OC entirely but don't have the guts to admit to the pro-OC crowd. And I'm not picking on Guns Over Texas specifically, but if you have a pro-2a radio show and are one of those POCWTRs who use your "tactical opinion" to cast OC in such a negative light then I'm not going to support your show, your sponsors, or anyone affiliated with you. You can have your tactical reservations, but I humbly request you to make sure your legal opinion is 100% clear. Thank you for responding.
Working on getting the last two weeks of shows posted. We've had some issues with the recordings and that's caused a hold up. Hopefully, I'll get those two shows posted tonight because I'd hate to got into the studio tomorrow having not posted them.ALso, will we be able to hear the show in question? I missed it live.
At least he should talk about the other side of the issue. Sometimes OC is the best tactical choice. Uniformed Police, for example.
Bithabus, I'm not arguing with you here.. just further pointing out:
The 2nd amendment as an individual right that should not be delegated solely to police and military officers in authority and possibly in uniforms.
I don't think The Founding Fathers intended it as such.
I agree Matefrio, but I take it 1 step further. Tactically, we can all have honest disagreements on whether we would OC in everyday life or certain situations if OC were legal. However, here is where I get a little upset with the people who make the claim of "I'm all for OC legally, but not tactically". For lack of a better word or phrase to describe this person, I will call them "Pro-OC with Tactical Reservations" (POCWTR). POCWTRs are starting to become the "voice of reason" that is keeping OC illegal. In fact, many POCWTRs are just anti-OC entirely but don't have the guts to admit to the pro-OC crowd. And I'm not picking on Guns Over Texas specifically, but if you have a pro-2a radio show and are one of those POCWTRs who use your "tactical opinion" to cast OC in such a negative light then I'm not going to support your show, your sponsors, or anyone affiliated with you. You can have your tactical reservations, but I humbly request you to make sure your legal opinion is 100% clear. Thank you for responding.