You have free will. The choice has always been yours to make. But there's still consequences.
Murder has always been a crime and would be tried in a criminal court if you were suspected. Even if there were no criminal court you would also still have any civil wrongful death cases to deal with.
It could work with no government at all as well but that would sideline this entire thread.
That's the point I was trying to make. If the government isn't involved in protecting rights it will leave us to use our own force to protect them.
I understand. You're also saying that the 30.06 and 30.07 signs are unnecessary and that not having them shouldn't be an infringement under different circumstances.
Not sure I completely understand this post as far as the infringement part goes. Yes, they could do away with both signs. And any sign that said "no guns allowed" would constitute notice that bringing a gun is trespassing. No other notice needed for a trespass charge.
I think it also makes people weigh what's important and let it go if it isn't. Something to consider. I wish there were more options for mediation and less government.
Too much incarceration and wasted money for things that aren't a big deal.
Maybe, but I don't believe people should be encouraged to let it go if one of their rights have been violated in some way, even light trespassing or ignoring of property rights. People have been encouraged to do that for so long that now it's become acceptable. I think a better option would be to keep cost down if it is a civil matter, but place the burden of payment for the requested compensation on the accuser should it turn out that no violation had occurred. Should reduce BS claims is think, but still not a perfect answer.
Sent from my HAL 9000