Yet you talk about how we can gain while they rebuild. We will be selling them shit on credit. If we didn't ensure their security we wouldn't be repaid. We would be more involved than ever.
And I didn't make the troll comment as an insult or because you disagree, it was the childish demeanor of your posts.
We're arguing about Iran on a thread about Scott Walker on a board about guns in Texas. Anyone posting or reading a post in earnest seriousness needs to re-appraise where they are posting and why.
Everyone buys on credit. They don't finance multibillion dollar projects from petty cash.
They will drill the oil. They will sell the oil. When they run out of the oil no one will ever care again.
We're arguing about Iran on a thread about Scott Walker on a board about guns in Texas. Anyone posting or reading a post in earnest seriousness needs to re-appraise where they are posting and why.
They will only drill oil if there is a stable government in the region.
Thats really really incorrect. Nigeria, Yemen, Iraq are examples.
In other words, you realize that your logic is flawed so you will pretend to not care anymore about the discussion you chose to participate in.
Iraq-US (HAHAH seriously?)
Yemen-Saudi (Yemen is in civil war and has been for a decade)
Nigeria-have to check (see yemen. Add in pirates)
Iraq-US
Yemen-Saudi
Nigeria-have to check
Two of the three have an outside influence making things work
This maybe should be it's own thread, but this one is already way off topic so... whatever...The participation rate (percentage of people in the workforce) is its lowest since the 70's.
This maybe should be it's own thread, but this one is already way off topic so... whatever...
I'm beginning to wonder if the labor participation numbers are really a bad thing? I suspect a fair number of the people that have been unemployed so long they have stopped looking for "regular" work have decided it's best to just be a stay at home dad or mom, or have found ways to survive being minimally self employed (cutting yards, painting fences, etc...) If that's the scenario, it means people are focusing more on their families and paying less taxes. That's a win in my book. If they are surviving off welfare, that's a whole other issue
I wouldn't,No, I'd much prefer $15/barrel.
Stay at home mom or stay at home dad... either are good for the family unit. I wish I had been a stay at home dad instead of focusing on my career. We would have been dirt poor living a subsistence lifestyle, but richer in family.Good thoughts.
I agree with moms staying home with the kids. We are better off as a society in those cases. But a large number of the long term unemployed are men as I recall. Majority either over 50 or young. Not so good.
I wouldn't,