Full size steel big bore revolvers don’t bother me but my Air weight J-frame with boot grips with 38 plus P makes me flinch and makes my hand go numb after 2 cylinders.
When I was a kid my dad would tell me "this is gonna hurt me more than it will you" right before he laid the wood to my backside.My 856 is steel. Never believed that .38Spl should be fired in anything lighter than a steel-frame. Save the ultralight frames for .22Mag snubs....
BTDT.My "oh spit" moment of reality came when I fired my Smith & Wesson model 337 with 158 grain +P in .38 special for the first time.
EVERYBODY REACTS TO RECOIL DIFFWERENTLY!Y'all have any issues? I was thinking about people shying away from guns because of it, but I honestly don't think about it anymore. When I first started shooting a lot, mitchinTx(RIP) handed me a .44 mag. Oh - I felt that - loved it. Bought a couple of .44 mag revolvers since. Worst one for me was a .500 mag shooting a trash can load - 700g or something - hurt my wrist for a week. I was probably gripping it too hard, and not letting it recoil naturally. Never got the hang of birds-head revolvers...
Rifles - I shoot a lot of intermediate cartridges - .223, 6.5 Grendel's, 7.62x39, there's a different jump up from those to what I'd call "full power" cartridges. Shooting a .308, etc. (7.5x55 Swiss with a steel butt plate is fun) doesn't bother me anymore I suppose because i'm used to it.
Thoughts? When I take newbs to the range, I bring a heavy barreled & stocked .223, it's like shooting a .22 lr, but more impressive.
Note to self, wake up before reading posts. It took caffeine to figure out what you meant.My 856 is steel. Never believed that .38Spl should be fired in anything lighter than a steel-frame. Save the ultralight frames for .22Mag snubs....
Don't shoot a Ruger Alaskan in .480 then.My "oh spit" moment of reality came when I fired my Smith & Wesson model 337 with 158 grain +P in .38 special for the first time.
The model 337 was an AirLite J frame revolver with a scandium frame and titanium cylinder that weighed 11oz. It was THE lightest revolver made then. What a joy to carry. I could drop it down into a bathrobe pocket and forget it was there.
Right there stamped in the barrel was a warning not to fire a lighter bullet than a 115 or 125 grain, I forget which.
Imagine choking up on an aluminum baseball bat, then swinging it as hard as you can into a telephone pole. That's exactly how my hands felt after one round. I jerked back against a 9lb. trigger pull while still in a painful haze because I couldn't believe how bad it was, and round two was touched off. That's it, I opened the cylinder and NEVER fired it again.
Now, if you can tell me with a straight face that you enjoy this kind of punishment .....
I'd like to just say that two rounds and it was over, but I can't. It took me many rounds over a couple of range sessions to beat the flinch that little revolver put on me.
I don't like recoil, because I like flat shooting guns. Handgun shooting isn't my strong suit as is, I don't need to handicap myself by adding unnecessary recoil / muzzle flip.
I don't care for the snappiness of .40 S&W or .357 Sig in general, and prefer .45ACP if I go bigger than 9mm.
I was out in the desert yesterday shooting my Glock 27, 23 and 22. The 22 and 23 are of the Gen5 versions, while the 27 is gen3. The recoil felt from a .40, especially out of a gen5 is nothing. The term “snappy” has been so over used and repeated ad nauseam.
Try shooting a .40 out of a Gen5 Glock 22 and you’ll never go back to a +P 9mm or .45 AARP ever again.
I probably won't get another 44mag. I used to have a Ruger Vaquero that was brutal with 44mag. It was pleasant to shoot with cowboy action 44spl but those were expensive. Today I don't mind shooting full power 357mag out of my 2 N-frame Smiths but won't shoot 357mag out of a snubby.
Full boat 12 ga field loads get a little dicey through an A5 after a couple boxes. That'll leave a mark for a while.