I get them.So what happens with his guns?
So he should have said "a bunch", or "a lot" of guns, and that would have been better?
"Mr. Mac, what does unprepossessing mean?""insouciant" I had to look that one up.
I’m kinda partial to “a metric sh*t ton”.
I beg to differ...Gonzales had multiple nut jobs..lolGonzales man apprehended after making multiple threats against hospital, staff - The Gonzales Inquirer
A Gonzales man who made headlines when he drove through a hotel lobby in Oklahoma nine years ago was arrested Friday, Sept. 13, after making terroristic threats against Gonzales Healthcare Systems …gonzalesinquirer.com
You got that right
"A follow-up investigation unveiled Carville allegedly had access to a plethora of firearms...."
A...plethora?
Plethora was used in an attempt to make it seem like the guys 3 guns were a shit ton of them. If it really was in excess of 30 guns they would have used the number. No need to exaggerate the figure
Y’all be quite the wordsmiths.
That's not even close to enoughSeems an appropriate number of guns to have.
That's not even close to enough
Yeah! And aren't they bound by the Commie Style Guide to say "virtual arsenal", anyway?I would consider use of the word "plethora" to be a sign of a news writer trying to sound smarter than they are. Got a feeling that person also uses words like "behooves" and "insouciant" whenever they can shoehorn them into a sentence, too. Seems a bit pretentious to me, and it leapt out of the sentence when I read it.