Went and used my LTC today.
In and out under an hr total.
Left with this bad boy.
M&P2.0 40S&W 3.6 in barrel.
Fixing to go try it out shortly.
Already stripped cleaned and lubed it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And.. Murphy's law.
I would like to think our current SCOTUS would rule these laws unconstitutional, but I have pretty much lost faith in them.
It is critical challenges originate in pro- gun courts like the 5th. If they originate in anti-gun courts they will be upheld, and that makes it easy for SCOTUS to just decline the case as they have in the past.
Assuming that any controversial bill will be filibustered by Republicans. So in practicality, what I said was correct.I think you are confusing with the votes need to close a filibuster vs pass a piece of legislation. See below.
In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill.
The Legislative Process | house.gov
www.house.gov
At the worst possible time...
The rationale is what the bill says must be done with regards to background checks; it does not necessarily need to strike any preexisting law - it makes new law that says X must be done and thus it MUST be done under the law. That is all it needs do to wipe out any exemption for LTC holders. Along the same lines, do you see anything in there about C&R FFL holders being allowed to continue transfer between each other or being allowed to receive C&R guns from unlicensed individuals? No you do not, that is unless I missed it, thus the same rationale there to say that C&R FFLs will become useless and that transfers between C&R holders will not be allowed. I foresee a class action lawsuit in that regard; then again I foresee a challenge to the law in the SC but that I think that will be years off if it passes. Of course, I also foresee another march on the Capital building but next time by armed individuals.
Agreed....
