That old dude just wasn't very good at his job. The more professional liberal media host would have been talking all over what was being said by the gun proponent making what was said unintelligible.
But honestly, for the average anti-gun joe or jane out there, fear is their reaction 100% of the time to being around a firearm, especially handguns. Most of them are anti-gun because of the fear. Fear born out of ignorance and fed by being told by the professional anti-gun establishment (those who have an agenda) that a gun is something other then what it is. That it is somehow different then a hammer or wrench or any other implement in a toolbox because this inanimate object possesses intent in a person's hands.
<==== been in the biz since 1979.
The audio engineer in the booth slowly raisrd the gain on the interviewers voice level and lowering that on the interviewee.
Also, the floor director alters camera angles. Cam 1 was a two shot and was about eye level. Cam 2 was on the interviewer and slightly lower so that it appears the audience is looking up, giving the feeling of importance. Cam 3 was on the interviewee and was slightly raised, looking down on him, giving the appearance of weakness.
An old and almost unperceptable ... inperceptable? ... trick that makes the interviewee appear weak and the interviewer strong.
LOL ... knew it didn't sound right ... its been a long day.
I'm a geek.
IDIOT... Police are trained LOL! as an officer, i will say i know a lot of officers who cant shoot worth a crap. NYPD had a great example of that a few months ago ey?
Why do people who know absolutely nothing about guns try to argue in a gun debate? Do they realize how stupid they look to the world?