How do you know that he wasn’t referring to his “python” girth?Quit braggin' bout your "python", 4" is really short!
Hey, I just lost 52# !How do you know that he wasn’t referring to his “python” girth?
The trigger pulls are not the problem. My trigger fingrers are fine, it is the thumbs which are very weak. This condition is common with us old folks.I'm lucky not to have arthritis, so I don't understand how a heavy trigger in a small revolver is helpful.
If one's joints are stiff and sore, wouldn't a lighter SAO trigger, as in a 1911/2011, be preferable, since it would require much less joint movement and effort?
And wouldn't a more full-size gun with a full-size grip enable stiff, sore hands to spread out and be comfortable, as opposed to trying to grip on a tiny nub of wood?
I'm sure it's a fine gun and a good value, just wondering about the tie-in to arthritis, nothing more. Hey, I might be in that situation some day, so it strikes me as good info to have.
I don’t like to shoot .357’s in a full-size revolver, much less a smaller gun. .45ACP is much more comfortable to shoot. We downsized from .45’s to G19’s a while back. Shooting the GLOCKS is no burden, but handling reloads, working the slides, & reloading the mags just gets more difficult. Of course the stock triggers suck, but I can deal with that.Personally I wouldn’t shy away from a Taurus revolver, but the price would need to be right. Just from the pics, this looks like a stout gun for just a 38 spec +P. I mean, a big chunk of steel is fine if .357 mag, but it seems a little much for the round. I’m partial to polished SS, but this is still a good looking piece
Are you using an overhand racking technique?The trigger pulls are not the problem. My trigger fingrers are fine, it is the thumbs which are very weak. This condition is common with us old folks.
Ya, but if I have a .357 mag size revolver, I want the option of shooting a .357 mag cartridge, even if I never do. If I corner myself to only .38 spec, then the gun better be lighter, but that’s just me...I don’t like to shoot .357’s in a full-size revolver, much less a smaller gun. .45ACP is much more comfortable to shoot. We downsized from .45’s to G19’s a while back. Shooting the GLOCKS is no burden, but handling reloads, working the slides, & reloading the mags just gets more difficult. Of course the stock triggers suck, but I can deal with that.
Eh...the new rugers are hit or miss. From my experience with a terrible sp101 I could gamble with the Taurus.I just can't.. rather save up for a Smith or Ruger
I dunno, my sp101 is smooth. Are you really judging “hit or miss” on one revolver? I do agree with you Taurus comment though, but I’d give pause before I ever tried out any of their autosEh...the new rugers are hit or miss. From my experience with a terrible sp101 I could gamble with the Taurus.
Understandable comment but I had several newer ruger guns I got rid of. Still, your comment would stand.I dunno, my sp101 is smooth. Are you really judging “hit or miss” on one revolver? I do agree with you Taurus comment though, but I’d give pause before I ever tried out any of their autos
At leaat a spring kit can fix a Ruger...lolEh...the new rugers are hit or miss. From my experience with a terrible sp101 I could gamble with the Taurus.
I have nothing bad to say about the new production Taurus revolvers. I have a 4" taurus tracker in .357, ported, and its solid. This one looks good, but nothing like the Python! I'm still looking for one.At this point, the price is not an obstacle, not even a consideration.
I searched Colt & S&W first, nothing interested me.
I already have a nice original 4” Python.