My thoughts also that’s why I asked for clarification.I could be wrong, but I think gaines67 is referring to Trump instead of the criminals in the article.
Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
While I don’t always agree with the positions his children have, they aren’t illegal and nothing has been proven or even remotely been shown to be accurate that any of them have done anything illegal. Are they all playing political games? Sure, but they learned a lot from previous administrations. Part of my problems with his children is they may still be wanting to make names for themselves and may push points and agendas that aren’t conservative, to garner fame and attention.
Back to the article, the people that initiated the investigation are not living up to their oath and decided to take it upon themselves to try and find a fire where no smoke was present because they didn’t like the outcome of an election. Also possibly to hide the their own sins in the Clinton server fiasco.
By this point if you don’t understand the “dossier” was opposition research by HRC and the DRC and then later handed off as legitimate there’s not much to tell you. Even the author of it does not stand by the claims. How telling is that?