Did yall notice the "Skit" pack in the pocket and can drink in hand? I wonder if that is what makes it more specific.
Otherwise, show me where TM owns the rights to the hoodie image.
This is exactly why I think it is specific to that case. The man got fired over it, so obviously it isn't that easily dismissible. Lack of attention to detail and the pride that is behind "being right", is what I think, makes people say it's just another target. Though, if someone els's kid was in this situation, rather the kid was right or wrong, they'd be making a huge deal about any target that resembled their kid. There's your double standard...