Cornyn suggests he might support universal background checks?

[CS_TX]

Cornyn needs to go either way he votes. He's getting way to comfortable up there.

 

[stdreb27]

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113s374rs/pdf/BILLS-113s374rs.pdf




Unless I'm misunderstanding pg 12 of the document, I don't think this is the case. Someone else have a look and tell me what you think.

And by no means does me offering an answer suggest I'm ok with this UBC crap. I am not! I am of the opinion that if you're gonna argue, have your facts straight. You lose credibility being ignorant on the subject. Let's be right about what we're saying.

When you hear universal background checks. That means every transfer would require a background check.
It's pointing the same direction as closing the gun show loop hole.

The reason this is bad, is simple. It's unenforceable without a gun registry.

A statement like congressman x is open to a compromise that would include universal background checks, would mean they don't have the legislation already in place to reference because they're negotiating it...

So it could be your worth nightmare or not...

 

[Anger]

Fuk Cornin

 

[Shorts]

When you hear universal background checks. That means every transfer would require a background check.
It's pointing the same direction as closing the gun show loop hole.

The reason this is bad, is simple. It's unenforceable without a gun registry.

A statement like congressman x is open to a compromise that would include universal background checks, would mean they don't have the legislation already in place to reference because they're negotiating it...

So it could be your worth nightmare or not...

I don't understand why you're telling me this. I'm well aware what a UBC and in no way do I support it. I'm taking your reply as a lecture as if I support a UBC. Would you clarify?

 

[shortround]

Make no mistake: "Universal Back Ground Check" means only one thing: National Gun Registration.

If you don't think it can happen here, think again.

California, Illinois, North Caroloina & New York (perhaps among others) require you to register the make, model, and serial number of the firearm you wish to purchase. California has already forced registered owners of certain guns to either surrender them to local law enforcement, or to sell them out of state.

Those data bases can be fused with other data bases such as driver licenses and vehicle registration tags.

Now, the government knows what guns you have, where you live, and what kind of vehicle you drive.

"Universal Back Ground Checks" is unconstitutional and a violation of our right to privacy.