Single stack WASR 10s are gun specific mags. PAXAll 7.62x39 mags should work in any 7.62x39 ak.
Single stack WASR 10s are gun specific mags. PAXAll 7.62x39 mags should work in any 7.62x39 ak.
the curvature of the AK magazine is due to the taper of 7.62x39Seams that AK's run better than the AR versions because of mags? Seems like more the curve of the mag enhances the feeding on AK's even though the grendel is closer on design?
also the czechoslovak VZ58 is NOT an AKIs it a Romanian vs Russian vs Chek vs Chinese and so on or v2 compatibility?
I'm AK illiterate along with foreign auto rifles.the curvature of the AK magazine is due to the taper of 7.62x39
also the czechoslovak VZ58 is NOT an AK
Czech/Slovak military never used the AK, they use the Vz.58 which is a completely different rifle from the Kalashnikov...Is it a Romanian vs Russian vs Chek vs Chinese and so on or v2 compatibility?
I also prefer stamped recievers to milled, just for the weight savings.
Try not to dive into the whiskey when you ask questions.7.62x39 has been in metric (.311/.312) and imperial (.308), but has been dependent on which platform (AR vs AK). At 1 time I've seen the 7.62x39 in .308 with matching brass. Does all AK mag work with all AK's regardless of country of origin?
A 7.62x39 can be a good shooter but in my cases it has appeared to be luck..303 brit bullets are .311 and will work fine for AKs.
But WHY reload this caliber, the AK is a nine pound hammer. it is NOT MOA accurate and cheap steel cased ammo is what it likes best. Get one, use and abuse it and then pass it down to your grandkids.
Whether it's a 7.62 or 5.45 I was questioning about the style, not just bullet differences. The 74 could be a good option also.personally if you ask me I feel 5.56mm AKs are the way to go.
Galil FTW!personally if you ask me I feel 5.56mm AKs are the way to go.
you do realize early AKs were milled because they tried to do stampings first but they didn't have all the tech there to make the early stampings durable until the AKM came about, right?Soviet AKs were originally made with milled receivers, which cracked after extensive firing. They switched to stamped, and that problem disappeared. On commercial, semi-only AKs, some prefer the milled receivers because they think that they're more durable than stamped. Okay, whatever. I saw a thread once where a guy made an AK receiver out of a Chinese D-handle shovel, for crying out loud! He left the D-handle on it to serve as the buttstock. Seemingly all foreign 7.62mm cartridges use bullets larger than .308"; some .310", some .311", and some .312" groove diameter. Wartime tolerances have given us barrels up to .316" groove diameter! Using bullets smaller than groove diameter leads to poor accuracy. Bullets larger than groove diameter leads to high pressure. I prefer to use the correct diameter, if available.
LoL, like the USA AR15 Modular lie......but some countries have issues with keeping standards.
Soviet AKs were originally made with milled receivers, which cracked after extensive firing. They switched to stamped, and that problem disappeared. On commercial, semi-only AKs, some prefer the milled receivers because they think that they're more durable than stamped. Okay, whatever. I saw a thread once where a guy made an AK receiver out of a Chinese D-handle shovel, for crying out loud! He left the D-handle on it to serve as the buttstock. Seemingly all foreign 7.62mm cartridges use bullets larger than .308"; some .310", some .311", and some .312" groove diameter. Wartime tolerances have given us barrels up to .316" groove diameter! Using bullets smaller than groove diameter leads to poor accuracy. Bullets larger than groove diameter leads to high pressure. I prefer to use the correct diameter, if available.