seeker_two
My posts don't count....
But only one is replicating Hitler’s nazi behavior.
True....but I don't think Hitler pooped his pants as much as Biden does....
But only one is replicating Hitler’s nazi behavior.
Don’t you mean his Depends?True....but I don't think Hitler pooped his pants as much as Biden does....
Hitler had more brains then Biden even after April 30...True....but I don't think Hitler pooped his pants as much as Biden does....
Nice. I'm going to steal that one.Hitler had more brains then Biden even after April 30...
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Worth the few minutes to watch:
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Ryan McBeth or someone else?<>
Looks to me that the star of this video is a turd.
But, what do I know ?
leVieux
<>
<>Ryan McBeth or someone else?
If McBeth please elaborate. He is accurate, fact based and knows his shit.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
What has he pushed that is leftist and how does it discredit his analysis of suspected russian disinformation trolls?<>
I got that he pushed some leftist ideas.
<>
Please see above.What has he pushed that is leftist and how does it discredit his analysis of suspected russian disinformation trolls?
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Tucker gave a former KGB agent with aspersions of globilist ambitions a platform to spread his lies without any correction or context. That's pretty much generating disinformation, I dont know what else anyone could call it.Please see above.
I don’t think Carlson generates ‘’disinformation’’.
Indeed, that is a devious leftist term & concept !
<>Tucker gave a former KGB agent with aspersions of globilist ambitions a platform to spread his lies without any correction or context. That's pretty much generating disinformation, I dont know what else anyone could call it.
Tuckers take on Ukraine and russia is so far off-base, combined with an "interview" of putin that was so flaccid even putin was disappointed makes me question Tucker's take on positions I agree with him on. In short I may agree with Tucker, like what he says and how he presents many arguments but I really don't trust him.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
<>
So, allowing a controversial person to state their case in their own words is “spreading disinformation”. ?
Gee, I think all should be heard, and let the listener decide. Isn’t that our longstanding tradition?
Remember that Hitler was Time’s 1938 “Man of the Year” ? see: https://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,760539,00.html
<>
If the purpose of a journalist is to simply publish what others say without context or commentary then what purpose do they serve that a platform such as Twitter, Facebook or Instagram does not?Tucker went to Russia to interview Putin, not debate him. The purpose, from the beginning was just to see what he had to say. So Tucker went over there and let him talk freely. something that most of us actually wish we saw more of with our media.
Not allowing the opposition to speak. Man this sounds familiar but I just can't point my finger to it.Tucker gave a former KGB agent with aspersions of globilist ambitions a platform to spread his lies without any correction or context. That's pretty much generating disinformation, I dont know what else anyone could call it.
Tuckers take on Ukraine and russia is so far off-base, combined with an "interview" of putin that was so flaccid even putin was disappointed makes me question Tucker's take on positions I agree with him on. In short I may agree with Tucker, like what he says and how he presents many arguments but I really don't trust him.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
Who suggested the opposition should be denied a platform for speech? Not me.Not allowing the opposition to speak. Man this sounds familiar but I just can't point my finger to it.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
The purpose is so that people like you don’t get your way and have control of the media narrative. If your beliefs about the proxy war are solid then you shouldn’t be concerned with what Putin is able to say.If the purpose of a journalist is to simply publish what others say without context or commentary then what purpose do they serve that a platform such as Twitter, Facebook or Instagram does not?
The extent to which some of you will go to pretend Tucker's putin interview was good journalism is approaching the level of KJ-P trying to frame FJB's policies in a favorable way.
Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk