That and anything nuke related. Insurance companies don't want to pay for entire cities.I thought rioting was excluded in most insurance policies.
I thought rioting was excluded in most insurance policies.
Let us know who your carrier is so we can switch! I've never seen a policy where acts of war, rioting, civil unrest were not excluded. That's a great insurer you have.I checked my policy a while back and it was not excluded. Acts of war weren't either.
obviously none....right?Looting and rioting in a major Liberal city by the “oppressed” masses? What seems to be the problem?
I thought rioting was excluded in most insurance policies.
"I checked my policy a while back and it was not excluded. Acts of war weren't either." Read it again!
Perhaps. But Minneapolis ain't Mogadishu.It’s really tough to understand being under siege by a mob until you are. The realization that there’s more of them than you and your team have bullets for is sobering.
Mogadishu still remains a great example of how quickly and badly trying to fight a mob can turn.
That’s not even including any politically-driven guidance that’s been provided by the Department or the the city.
I am pretty certain the precinct had more than 300 rounds. And I agree with JBR. This bunch would have scattered.A mob is hard to predict. If you don't have enough bullets to stop them you may not want to try.
Perhaps. But Minneapolis ain't Mogadishu.
I believe the crowd would scatter like chickens with their tails on fire after the first couple of looters went down.
This seems quite true to me.The theory of shooting the first looters works fine (sometimes) in war; on main street USA, not so much.
This seems quite true to me.
However, don't they need to do SOMETHING?
Understand.These riots are a huge mess any way they play out for LE. Damned if they do something to stop them, and damned if they don't try something to stop them. I can see them as public relations nightmare for city officials.