Supreme Court just ruled on "remain in Mexico" policy

[TX OMFS]

The OP is actually an important bit of news.

Now, how does the judicial branch do anything to force the executive branch to comply?

 

[amberloo]

they need to send back the hundred of thousands that have been let in sense biden started this

 

[toddnjoyce]

… why place the comma between "sentence structure" and "and spelling", it was unnecessary….

Shut your mouth. The Oxford comma may not be loved, but it is stylistically correct in his usage.

 

[alwho421]

well I believed we discussed guns and gun related issues here. If I wanted English lessons I would have gone to Yale or UT. Tolls win screw this forum.

 

[toddnjoyce]

The OP is actually an important bit of news.

Now, how does the judicial branch do anything to force the executive branch to comply?

You’re correct and this will be interesting to watch. To paraphrase Andy Jackson in response to Marbury v Madison, the chief justice has made a ruling, now let him enforce it. Lincoln also conveniently ignored a Supreme Court ruling that declared his suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional.

Congress could also just pass an act to change the existing law and render it all moot. My money is that it will just be ignored, much like the eviction ruling will be.

 

[amberloo]

You’re correct and this will be interesting to watch. To paraphrase Andy Jackson in response to Marbury v Madison, the chief justice has made a ruling, now let him enforce it. Lincoln also conveniently ignored a Supreme Court ruling that declared his suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional.

Congress could also just pass an act to change the existing law and render it all moot. My money is that it will just be ignored, much like the eviction ruling will be.

congress cant just pass an act to change it unless they git sixty votes in the congress to vote for it and repubs wont vote for it

 

[avvidclif]

If you are so smart, why place the comma between "sentence structure" and "and spelling", it was unnecessary. Then again, why not add one where it actually was needed between: "If you're proud of it" and "so be it". I am not criticizing your abilities but I am asking because it makes me wonder, why would you criticize someone else's spelling or grammar when you do not get your own right?

Because that's proper grammar when addressing multiple subjects. I'm not an English major but I am fairly conversant.

The second comma was not required as it was a statement.

 

[benenglish]

If you are so smart, why place the comma between "sentence structure" and "and spelling", it was unnecessary. Then again, why not add one where it actually was needed between: "If you're proud of it" and "so be it". I am not criticizing your abilities but I am asking because it makes me wonder, why would you criticize someone else's spelling or grammar when you do not get your own right?

I'm not proud to post this but I can't resist. May God and Glenn B forgive me.

It's generally not wise to post a comment correcting the grammar of another user when every sentence in your post contains errors.

 

[gll]

I'm not proud to post this but I can't resist. May God and Glenn B forgive me.

It's generally not wise to post a comment correcting the grammar of another user when every sentence in your post contains errors.

While true, I think you missed where this started. Grammar nazism is generally non-productive.

 

[benenglish]

Grammar nazism is generally non-productive.

I agree. That's why I said I wasn't proud to post my observation.

 

[Sasquatch]

You’re correct and this will be interesting to watch. To paraphrase Andy Jackson in response to Marbury v Madison, the chief justice has made a ruling, now let him enforce it. Lincoln also conveniently ignored a Supreme Court ruling that declared his suspension of habeas corpus unconstitutional.

Congress could also just pass an act to change the existing law and render it all moot. My money is that it will just be ignored, much like the eviction ruling will be.

congress cant just pass an act to change it unless they git sixty votes in the congress to vote for it and repubs wont vote for it

Supreme Court should have some authority to direct a law enforcement branch to take into custody members of the Executive and Legislative branches that wilfully ignore the verdicts/orders of SCOTUS and hold them in contempt, or suspend the powers/authority of those individuals until such time as the judicial orders are followed. When the gentlemanly agreement between branches falls apart, only the Executive branch has any enforcement mechanism at their disposal, since they control federal law enforcement and the military.

 

[skfullgun]

Reminds me of a joke...

Where is the library at, A$$hole?

 

[bbbass]

Whale, ahma soitenly notta gonna cast da foist stohn!!! Specially sense ah gots no since...

 

[seeker_two]

Supreme Court should have some authority to direct a law enforcement branch to take into custody members of the Executive and Legislative branches that wilfully ignore the verdicts/orders of SCOTUS and hold them in contempt, or suspend the powers/authority of those individuals until such time as the judicial orders are followed. When the gentlemanly agreement between branches falls apart, only the Executive branch has any enforcement mechanism at their disposal, since they control federal law enforcement and the military.

I've always thought the US Marshals Service should be under SCOTUS for this reason.....

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

 

[chevyext02]

I did it the legal way and waited about a year to get the wife here in the US.

 

[chevyext02]

Whale, ahma soitenly notta gonna cast da foist stohn!!! Specially sense ah gots no since...

wat intarnashen spellin dat

 

[wiredgeorge]

Damn. Threads usually make it past post #2 before getting derailed.

Is this a new record?

Stay out of this! The GUARDIAN OF GRAMMAR has been unleashed! A fairly important SCOTUS decision was posted and the poster MUST BE PUNISHED for sloppy grammar and miserable spelling! Off with his head.... By the way TXStetson, pointing out the thread was derailed by someone carping about grammar/spelling was spot on.

 

[Axxe55]

Carry on. Quantity is much more important than quality.

 

[skfullgun]

Carry on. Quantity is much more important than quality.

It isn't about the size of the dog in the fight, as much as it is the size of the fight in the dog!

 

[skfullgun]

Is that pertinent? Does it apply to this thread? Is it relevant?

Or, am I redundant, repetitive, and constantly saying the same thing over and over again?