Senate Democrats prepare marathon floor session on gun violence

[Southpaw]

Hadn't seen this mentioned in any other places besides this link I found and the email I received from the Horny Housewives this morning. It doesn't seem like it's anything but hot air, but figured I would post anyway.

https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/senate-democrats-prepare-marathon-floor-session-gun-violence

 

[El Spicoli]

Wait, can you tell me more about these emails from horny housewives?

Sent from my SM-T380 using Tapatalk

 

[AustinN4]

Wait, can you tell me more about these emails from horny housewives?

Yep! That was my take away from his post also.

 

[Southpaw]

Wait, can you tell me more about these emails from horny housewives?

Sent from my SM-T380 using Tapatalk

She's all you bud...

 

[El Spicoli]

A good rogering could change her mind. It is at least worth a try.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

 

[WAYnorthTX]

Senate Democrats prepare marathon circular jerky dance session on gun violence.
-Fixed it.

 

[pronstar]

She's all you bud...
View attachment 185034

Yup, she wants action all right...says so right there LOL


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[EZ-E]

Yup, she wants action all right...says so right there LOL


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[gll]

Wait, can you tell me more about these emails from horny housewives?

Sent from my SM-T380 using Tapatalk

Don't you ever look in your Spam folder?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

[Bozz10mm]

From the article, someone explain this. I thought it was already required:

"Manchin and Toomey led an effort in 2013, which would have required background checks on all commercial sales of guns. It fell five votes short in the Senate."

 

[Younggun]

Maybe they wanted to close the “LTC Loophole”.



Probably just uninformed journalist syndrome though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[AustinN4]

"uninformed journalist"

Seems to be the norm these days.

 

[vmax]

From the article, someone explain this. I thought it was already required:

"Manchin and Toomey led an effort in 2013, which would have required background checks on all commercial sales of guns. It fell five votes short in the Senate."

This is almost certainly talking about SB 11 after Sandy Hook
It was , in part, a UBC requirement

 

[txinvestigator]

Maybe they wanted to close the “LTC Loophole”.



Probably just uninformed journalist syndrome though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

An intentional law isn't really a loophole, is it?

If the law required a background check to purchase fewer than 3 guns, and a background check and a wait to buy more than 3 guns, then they unintentionally created a loophole.

Right?

 

[Younggun]

An intentional law isn't really a loophole, is it?

If the law required a background check to purchase fewer than 3 guns, and a background check and a wait to buy more than 3 guns, then they unintentionally created a loophole.

Right?

It was sarcasm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Ole Cowboy]

From the article, someone explain this. I thought it was already required:

"Manchin and Toomey led an effort in 2013, which would have required background checks on all commercial sales of guns. It fell five votes short in the Senate."

WTH, you mean background checks are NOT required? And I thought after all these years they were...WOW!

TO be honest I really look forward to this as other than "common sense" guns laws (which I have NO FRIGGIN idea what that is) and Background checks (which I thought we were doing) I gots no idea of what they want other than what the want they will not say (except Beto)! I still think and believe their end goal is ZERO guns in the hands of the common everyday American. But gun ownership will still be available to the Hollywood elite and their bodyguards, high ranking Politico's, the uber-rich Billionaires and LEO's (I have very little faith in CITY police that they will stand on our side, they are UNION and the Union is not on our side).

Lets hope they expose the TRUTH and join in with BETO, some already have...

 

[Kar98]

Anybody who thinks police and other LEAs will be on our side hasn't learned from history, and should at least read Unintended Consequences.

 

[toddnjoyce]

Anybody who thinks police and other LEAs will be on our side hasn't learned from history, and should at least read Unintended Consequences.

Some will, some won’t. Just like today.

 

[Ole Cowboy]

Anybody who thinks police and other LEAs will be on our side hasn't learned from history, and should at least read Unintended Consequences.

Concur, the city/unionized police are bought and paid for by unions and the Feds, they will comply with what they are told to do. You can see this on TV near daily with COP not enforcing or support ICE and sanctuary cities and not arresting people.

 

[roadkill]

Is it time to feed the hogs yet?