What is SCOTUS so scared of?
Think you're right.Loss of power.
Big .gov is afraid that if they allow little chips in the wall of gun control to happen eventually the wall falls.
NO WAY will the Swamp allow that to happen.
Disappointing, but not surprising. The court cannot rule a law which does not exist unconstitutional.
Considering three justices dissented, I would mootness wasn’t as clear cut as believed. Several court-watchers also mentioned that Kavanaugh waivered, perhaps so as to not leave Roberts hanging in the wind.The case was correctly ruled mooted because the plaintiffs got everything they sought.
Valid point on the first.Considering three justices dissented, I would mootness wasn’t as clear cut as believed. Several court-watchers also mentioned that Kavanaugh waivered, perhaps so as to not leave Roberts hanging in the wind.
Here are the 10 Cases going to Conference on Friday:
Mance v Barr (18-663) whether the federal government can prohibit interstate handgun sales
Pena v Horan (18-843) (California) whether possession of a gun can be limited to "safe" guns
Rogers v Grewal (18-824) (New Jersey) whether the government can require a "special need" in order to allow carry outside the house
Gould v Lipson (18-1272) (Massachusetts) whether the government can require a "special need" in order to allow carry outside the house
Ciolek v New Jersey (19-114) whether the government can require a "justifiable need" in order to grant a carry permit
Cheeseman v Polillo (19-27) (New Jersey) whether licenses can require a "justifiable need" for possessing a gun
Worman v Healey (19-404) (Massachusetts) whether "assault weapons" and "large capacity feeding devices" can be banned
Malpasso v Pallozzi (19-423) (Maryland) whether licenses can require a "good and substantial reason" for possessing a gun
Culp v. Raoul (19-487) (Illinois) Whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms requires Illinois to allow qualified non-residents to apply for an Illinois concealed-carry license.
Wilson v. Cook County (19-704) (Illinois) Whether the Second Amendment allows a local government to prohibit law-abiding residents from possessing and protecting themselves and their families with a class of rifles and ammunition magazines that are in common use at this time.