Couldn't be any worse than Ted Kennedy.
Along with your comments. That video was only a small edited portion of an obviously larger piece. What was said before this video started. What is the full context of what he said. The libtards are pros at using sound bites and twisting words and using things out of context.And how is he a traitor? Do you know his history on public health care? Obviously no.
Research and see why may have said what he did. Or at least know his track record.
+1I'll take the current Ted over ALL these politicians
What we have to do with healthcare is get the government out of it. The cost increases are due to interference from the government, insurance companies, AMA, frivelous lawsuits, etc. If left alone, it would be just like the market. It would take care of itself.
Also, a while back, people started using insurance for just everything. Insurance was meant to pay for things that were catastrophic. If you break your leg, write a check and pay the hospital and the doc. Don't make a claim for just everything. That's one reason why insurance costs so much and why medical costs are up. Just one reason.
What we have in our society is the regulatory jack boot stamping on our faces every second of every day. You want to think about that for awhile before responding. What we do NOT need is more regulation. We need to tear down much of the regulation we have and replace it with a very simple set of rules. Excess in regulation serves only to enslave us. There is absolutely no ethical or moral basis for their being over 22,000 gun laws when 22 would probably serve any needed purpose (I'd prefer 0). To see proof of this, take a look at all the current and proposed regulation in the EU. There is so much, there isn't enough time to even read it all!"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face....forever."
That video is just another one of the twisted out of context bullshit videos being circulated by the tinfoil hat nutjobs. If you listened to the entire speech, he was speaking hypothetically about what congress was up to and asking if that was the right or wrong way to handle it. I'm no Brown cheerleader... but give the guy a chance. Hell, he has to be better than Kennedy.
If you wanna fix healthcare. Get the LAWYERS out of it. Companies and Doctors have to charge many times what they would need to charge to be profitable to cover their asses against frivolous lawsuits. Every day I see another LAWYERETARD on TV telling me that they can sue if I took this pill or that pill and get me money. Delete the lawyers and you fix the problem.
The divide and conquer game of Dem vs. Republican is a losing game. If you think anything will ever change with that mentality, you are only fooling yourself. Take a look back through history and you will see that things have only ever really gotten worse for us overall. Sure, we've been given political table scraps here and there, but as far as the big picture goes we are still headed 180 degrees away from true freedom. Regardless of who the politicians are that are running (and no I'm not referring to Medina here), your choices are boiled down to Soylent Red vs. Soylent Green people! The us vs. them approach never works to our benefit in politics.
Healthcare reform? Sure, we need it. We don't need a government healthcare plan. What we need is for the government to reverse much of the legislation and regulation out there, to stop interfering with healthcare in the manner it has because it is the primary reason for the increases in cost of healthcare. Things didn't use to be this hard or this expensive people. This is the same concept as the government attempting to run our economy. They are neither intelligent enough or capable of doing so, and the end result will be drastically increased legislation, regulation, costs will go through the roof, and we'll all suffer accordingly. Things definitely need to change, but not just change for change sake (there's that word CHANGE).
Would everyone like to know what the problem is? People think our government is there to look out for us, the people. This is basically the original intention behind the federal government. In reality, this is not what our government has become. There is a famous line from the book 1984:
What we have in our society is the regulatory jack boot stamping on our faces every second of every day. You want to think about that for awhile before responding. What we do NOT need is more regulation. We need to tear down much of the regulation we have and replace it with a very simple set of rules. Excess in regulation serves only to enslave us. There is absolutely no ethical or moral basis for their being over 22,000 gun laws when 22 would probably serve any needed purpose (I'd prefer 0). To see proof of this, take a look at all the current and proposed regulation in the EU. There is so much, there isn't enough time to even read it all!
The unfunded liabilities of medicare/medicaid/social security will be the destruction of this country financially. They number in the TENS of trillions of dollars if you actually research it a bit. You know what I would much rather have? I'd rather have the government stop regulating every facet of our lives, freeing everyone up to truly go out and make something out of their own lives. If that were to occur, we wouldn't need the government or government programs to support us later in life as we'd have full capability to make ourselves as successful as full and complete freedom entails, and with the ability to ensure our own futures by ourselves. That may be a bit of an idealistic belief, but I still honestly believe it is within everyone's capability of achieving if we just put our minds to it.