YepI bet the wind energy is suddenly abundant.
Trump told china to take a hike. We cheered.
Like it or not, our manufacturing facilities aren't up to where we need them yet.
Actually, the legislature can do something about it as can the PUC.
Well, we are still importing a LOT from China. Not that it does much good for major equipment items. Chinese quality is crap on its best day. I am watching equipment purchased from them fail at alarming rates, pretty much from the day installed.
We are well past the dawn of manufacturing. I don't know of any American company that considers a 1% failure rate acceptable.I am no fan of China, but I think this is anecdotal at best. Since the dawn of manufacturing a 1 to 5 % failure rate has always been considered standard. If any major equipment fails at higher than a 5% failure rate engineers take a look at it. Most of them are Chinese, Taiwanese, or Malaysian. How do I know? I work with them.
They do not work at all when snow covered, and produce very little output on the kind of cloudy days we had.I have been contemplating solar power for a bit. I don't know how it would have worked when the panels are covered in snow(probably not at all). The technology is constantly being improved BUT. Last numbers I saw the breakeven point on a solar install was abt 20 years. And that is about the same point as replacement will be needed. Didn't make sense to me.
We are well past the dawn of manufacturing. I don't know of any American company that considers a 1% failure rate acceptable.
This is a little more than anecdotal. I have seen it across different industries and over more a couple of decades.
Would anyone accept a failure rate of over 50% in gearboxes within the first few years? Don't think so.
Even some as simple as parts for computers. One major manufacturer had a warehouse dedicated to rejects found on the assembly/testing line. Full of Chinese manufactured parts.
Engineers aren't making the procurement decisions and have little to no say in sourcing at most companies. And that is the problem. Accountants are in the C suite. Procurement is evaluated on how much they reduce prices on purchased goods. Who is cheapest? China. So they buy from China and leave the engineers to clean up the mess. GE is spending $100 million at one site alone to replace equipment they bought from China and warrantied to the end user. But they saved $200, 000 buying cheap from China.
Gearboxes, generators, bearings. Every OEM I deal with using these Chinese manufactured parts has extremely high failure rates and are spending a fortune in warranty. Some have been hit so hard, they are sourcing elsewhere now.
No company I ever worked for considered a 1% reject rate acceptable, much less 5%.Every OEM computer manufacturer considers 5% or less acceptable. I don't know what world you live in but that's the way it is.
GE I don't work for. I only know what I see but we ship 120 million units a year of extremely sensitive equipment. Servers that cost more than your house for just one of them. I'm telling you what I know working directly with engineers. 1 to 5%
5% seems insanely high. Is there a decimal missing maybe and you mean 0.5% ?I am no fan of China, but I think this is anecdotal at best. Since the dawn of manufacturing a 1 to 5 % failure rate has always been considered standard. If any major equipment fails at higher than a 5% failure rate engineers take a look at it. Most of them are Chinese, Taiwanese, or Malaysian. How do I know? I work with them.
Breakeven as in your'e net-zero with where you would have been with doing nothing or breakeven where you've saved enough to pay for the solar with savings on your bill?I have been contemplating solar power for a bit. I don't know how it would have worked when the panels are covered in snow(probably not at all). The technology is constantly being improved BUT. Last numbers I saw the breakeven point on a solar install was abt 20 years. And that is about the same point as replacement will be needed. Didn't make sense to me.
For the 15,000th time, WE ARE NOT IMMUNE FROM FEDERAL REGULATION!!!Back on topic. I came across this page. Some information goes pretty much against the idea of our independent electric grid that is not subject to federal regulation.
How true is the information? While it would not surprise me if that was real, my skeptical inner self would like some kind of confirmation.
Yep. Smitty is correct.For the 15,000th time, WE ARE NOT IMMUNE FROM FEDERAL REGULATION!!!
Most of my job is complying with NERC regulations. Look up NERC 693. Better yet here
Click on that.
EVERY electric utility in Texas must comply with the sections that pertain to them in that document.
The fine for not complying is up to ONE MILLION DOLLARS A DAY.
There is a entity, TexasRE, whose sole purpose is to do audits to ensure compliance.
I’m getting real tired of clueless people perpetuating this myth.
Only when Uncle Joe and ",la" talk.I bet the wind energy is suddenly abundant.