Welcome to Psychological Operations. I would not at all be surprised if the WSJ article was sourced by Mossad. I can tell you that Mossad did not booby trap a batch of pagers over a weekend. They have been planning and influencing this for a while.Mossad did not have to start whispers. The terrorists had already realized their communications devices were giving away their locations.
WSJ article detailed how they have moved to couriers.
Hamas’s top leader Yahya Sinwar could well be dead today if not for a low-tech communications system honed in prison that shields him from Israel’s intelligence-gathering dragnet.
Sinwar has largely shunned phone calls, text messages and other electronic communications that Israel can track and that have led to the demise of other militants. Instead, he is using a complex system of couriers, codes and handwritten notes that allows him to direct Hamas’s operations even while hiding in underground tunnels, according to Arab cease-fire mediators.
The easiest way to modify a behavior is to think it originated organically, rather than from an outside source. It’s much easier to accept change if you think it can from within your organization. So if Mossad could make Hezbollah think they realized internally that cell phones were bad and pagers were good, the change would happen swiftly and quickly.
Think of it this way. Mossad was definatley using cell tracking to kill a few Hezbollah operatives. They could have kept quiet on their methods. But if they saw an opportunity to have a greater effect, they release a statement saying “We will continue to use cell tracking technology to locate and kill our enemy.” Somehow that story makes Toto the WSJ. Now Hezbollah leadership says, damn—we need to shit can our cell phones for pagers that can’t be tracked. And the end result is by influencing behaviors, Mossad can put their pager plan into action.
Down and dirty lesson on Psywar in a combat environment.