Underwhelmed is an understatement. The lady at the door said ATF and APD had 12 cases against the Saxet prior to their departure (for what specifically she didn't say). They threatened to shut down this weekend's show if the terms were not met. It sounds more like a terms of use thing for the venue to me. The cases sound more like individuals selling to ineligible parties.
Who owns the property?
Who leases the property?
I'm confused so, can we start there please? I'd like to see the "rules" or terms of use. I guess that'd be the contract. Is that possible?
I'm just wondering what ATF has to do with local ordinances.
I can't see how the city can enforce such an ordinance - it's a restriction on legal trade, where no one is breaking any law. If the promoter DID set something like that up, he's begging to be run outta the business, IMO.
That is my question as well?
I mean I can understand a promoter or city setting up a FFL dealer only rule but how does the BATF fit into this?
It's private property, not city property.
The city has absolutely NO jurisdiction. APD has absolutely NO say, and NO right to arrest people for LEGAL trade.
This is a strong arm tactic by the anti-gun APD brass and the local ATF.
Exactly WHO owns the venue? I've heard HEB, the City of Austin....if it's the City of Austin, then yeah - they CAN put that stipulation in there as landlords - that's what needs to be determined.