satx78247 said:Did you know that the victim's own brother testified that he did NOT believe that she was guilty
Yeah, let me help you with that. Here it is. Let us know MM:SS where he says he thinks she is not guilty.I suggest that you check out the testimony of the victim's brother & what he testified to during the Penalty Phase of the trial earlier today
Soooo...Dallasites....is there a shitshow goin on?
Just for the record, intent and premeditation only require a fraction of a second and thought.To All,
Presuming that what WOAI has reported is TRUTHFUL, I'm DISGUSTED with the prosecutor, jury, grand jury, judge & everyone else who were involved in prosecution of this case for MURDER.
A conviction for MURDER REQUIRES a SPECIFIC CRIMINAL INTENT to KILL a particular person(s). = At MOST she should have been convicted of NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE & been sentenced to no more than a year in the county jail OR have received probation, as she had NO SPECIFIC INTENT but instead acted with NEGLIGENCE to the consequences of her actions.
(Good thing for the Dallas DA that I wasn't on the jury, as I would have voted Not Guilty to MURDER & likely also to MANSLAUGHTER & would have "HUNG the jury", at worst, IF I couldn't have convinced the other 11 jurors about SPECIFIC INTENT.)
just my opinions, satx
Appeal?
She might get a new trial based on location or the judges decisions on evidence or testimony. I doubt seriously they will overturn it outright.
Her chances are slim and she might even be eligible for release by then.
SJWs always project... has a tendency to FALSELY accuse others of dishonesty, IF they disagree with him in any detail.
What does the L.E. Manual have to do with this case?
SJWs always project
Understatement of the year.She made many mistakes, IMHO.