Capitol Armory ad

Mass. Welfare pays more then most households make working

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • RACER X

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2013
    2,982
    46
    Richmond/Houston
    9900http://bostonherald.com/news_opinio...tts_welfare_pays_better_than_entry_level_jobs

    "Massachusetts pays its welfare recipients what would amount an pre-tax wage of more than $24 an hour, and ranks third in the nation in terms of dollars doled out per welfare collector, according to a new study released by the Cato Institute.
    The libertarian think tank based in Washington D.C., estimates the total value of the state’s “typical” welfare package — which can include cash, food, housing and medical assistance — if it were taxable income, at $50,540, more than most entry-level wages. The report said that creates an incentive to remain on government assistance.
    “Still, it is undeniable that for many recipients – especially long-term dependents – welfare pays more than the type of entry-level job that a typical welfare recipient can expect to find,” the study says. “As long as this is true, many recipients are likely to choose welfare over work.”
    The Bay State gave $42,515 worth of welfare to the “typical recipient” in 2013, only behind Washington D.C., at $43,099 and Hawaii at $49,175, the study says, adding that the pre-tax value of a total Massachusetts benefits package if it were an earned salary would be $50,540.
    A spokesman for the state’s Department of Transitional Assistance could not immediately be reached for comment.
    Read the study: The Work versus Welfare Trade-Off: 2013
    - See more at: http://bostonherald.com/news_opinio...er_than_entry_level_jobs#sthash.tCeZoRnp.dpuf



    sent from my cell phone, far far away but still monitored by the NSA
     
    Last edited:

    Brains

    One of the idiots
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Apr 9, 2013
    6,933
    96
    Spring
    That is such an obvious problem, it baffles me why our "elected officials" would choose to keep pushing it. Of course, the answer is they're merely buying votes with someone else's (our) money.
     

    Ole Cowboy

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 23, 2013
    4,061
    96
    17 Oaks Ranch
    I have a copy of the Report done by the CATO Institute. What the papers and the news are reporting is well, just page 1 of the story. Page 2, as Paul Harvey used to say tells us more, far more. While you would have to make as much as $60,000 per year to equal the welfare package that number is for a single recipient. Thru what is called 'stacking' where one qualifies then adds in kids and other family such as grandparents (no, not kidding) you can bring the amount up into the $100,000 range as a total package, you would have to be making about $150,000 to equal, perhaps more.

    Total costs for federal Pay to not work programs runs about $1 Trillion annually and this does not include the costs to manage the programs, which runs into the 100's of billions....
     

    mosin

    Active Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 21, 2013
    876
    21
    Laredo
    I saw some breakdown of benefits that a single woman with two kids making a 15-20k per year will after benefits have more disposable income than a two parent home with two kids making close to 100k
     

    IXLR8

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 19, 2009
    4,428
    96
    Republic of Texas
    Surely it will all implode someday. Perhaps if they only allowed welfare payments in say South Dakota, where the equivalent cost of living is only $25K. The government could pay for relocation and still save nearly 50%. There would be sufficient incentive to try and earn a living wage anywhere else....
    Massachusetts residents will eventually get tired of paying for the social welfare programs and move elsewhere. It is happening all over the world.
     
    Top Bottom