<>
Until the late 19th or early 20th Century, the Middle East was a region of large cities with indistinct extra-urban territorial boundaries, unlike modern western nations which traditionally have clearly marked national borders.
Historians & Anthropologists tell that ‘’Palestine’’ was an ethnicity, whose Bedouin peoples lived across the poorly demarcated city-states of the Middle East; not a geographic ‘’nation’’. They frequently and voluntarily moved from one city-state into or across others, seasonally.
Israel is and was a Nation of People, in a historically recognized physical place, but twice forced into exile & diaspora by foreign military occupiers.
The creation of modern ‘’Palestine’’ as a geographic entity was a ploy to displace Israelis once again.
Is the above correct?
Is there actual legitimmate fact-based argument against that explanation ?
If you know, please explain in reply.
leVieux
<>
Until the late 19th or early 20th Century, the Middle East was a region of large cities with indistinct extra-urban territorial boundaries, unlike modern western nations which traditionally have clearly marked national borders.
Historians & Anthropologists tell that ‘’Palestine’’ was an ethnicity, whose Bedouin peoples lived across the poorly demarcated city-states of the Middle East; not a geographic ‘’nation’’. They frequently and voluntarily moved from one city-state into or across others, seasonally.
Israel is and was a Nation of People, in a historically recognized physical place, but twice forced into exile & diaspora by foreign military occupiers.
The creation of modern ‘’Palestine’’ as a geographic entity was a ploy to displace Israelis once again.
Is the above correct?
Is there actual legitimmate fact-based argument against that explanation ?
If you know, please explain in reply.
leVieux
<>