I might be failing the intelligence test --- 30.06

[larcat]

If I understand this correctly, and I'm not at all sure that I do:

For non LTC holders, the sign doesn't mean anything.

For LTC holders it doesn't mean anything unless:

An agent of the establishment verbally reiterates the sign, in which case you need to vacate the premises or you are comitting non felony criminal trespass.

Premises being, effectively, buildings.

Am I just being thick? It isn't intuitive. The prohibited places are pretty straight forward.

Any ideas on LTC holder employee in a place with no 30.06 but a no CC clause in the handbook? Cause for termination, but an infraction?

 

[ZX9RCAM]

Any ideas on LTC holder in a place with no 30.06 but a no CC clause in the handbook? Cause for termination, but an infraction?

And all non employees are welcome to carry guns.
It's ridiculous.

My last job was like this.

 

[toddnjoyce]

Pretty much correct, and for an LTC holder leaving when asked is a defense to prosecution. There’s potentially another DTP available, too.

In short though, there’s not a single 30.06 conviction on DPS’ crime stats page though, which should tell you something. Especially if you think through the gymnastics that have to occur to get a cop there to cite you knowing that the store can’t keep you from leaving.

 

[BigRed]

I thought this would be about an excellent rifle cartridge!

 

[larcat]

I thought this would be about an excellent rifle cartridge!

The statute number feels like trolling to me

 

[BigRed]

I do love the cartridge!