Wow. The guy behind the counter was clueless as what to do at first. He needs some training in how to better respond.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can tell because it didn't jam.Glock
To what short attention span do you refer? You say he should have been paying attention to that guy instead of "gabbing with customers! What the heck do you think his job involves if not attending to customers? The guy behind the counter was never dealing with the moron (if this was for real and not a set-up for the cameras) who was handling the gun. Thus, his attention seemed to be on the customers to the moron's left and never seemed to waver - it seemed rather attentive to those customers. Maybe he should have seen the moron but maybe not. It would be nice if you could see everything going on around you but from what I saw in that video, the guy behind the counter had his attention on a few customers on the other side of the counter and I see no reason to call it a short attention span. Maybe he was overly attentive to them and thus did not see the other guy (the moron) handling the gun but he seemingly did not have a short attention span relative to the customers with whom he was dealing. Whatever, the guy handling it (the moron), who discharged it, is the ONLY one responsible for having done so. Responsibility for not seeing him handling it, I am not too sure you can blame that on the guy behind the counter although I would have given him brownie points had he seen it.The guy at the counter is also responsible in my opinion. I think most of the shops and ranges in Texas require that all personal firearms be cased or holstered. He should have been watching what the guy was doing instead of gabbing with other customers. The short attention span of people these days is almost comical.
I have seen a lot of Glock pistol cases, never saw one that looked like that; but of course, I have not seen them all. Could be a Glock I suppose, then again, what does that have to do with anything?Glock
To what short attention span do you refer? You say he should have been paying attention to that guy instead of "gabbing with customers! What the heck do you think his job involves if not attending to customers? The guy behind the counter was never dealing with the moron (if this was for real and not a set-up for the cameras) who was handling the gun. Thus, his attention seemed to be on the customers to the moron's left and never seemed to waver - it seemed rather attentive to those customers. Maybe he should have seen the moron but maybe not. It would be nice if you could see everything going on around you but from what I saw in that video, the guy behind the counter had his attention on a few customers on the other side of the counter and I see no reason to call it a short attention span. Maybe he was overly attentive to them and thus did not see the other guy (the moron) handling the gun but he seemingly did not have a short attention span relative to the customers with whom he was dealing. Whatever, the guy handling it (the moron), who discharged it, is the ONLY one responsible for having done so. Responsibility for not seeing him handling it, I am not too sure you can blame that on the guy behind the counter although I would have given him brownie points had he seen it.