You can sue for literally ANYTHING....doesnt mean she will win. Maybe in San Fransico this would be an issue. Not in Texas. Unless you have a pro-zombie judge and jury!A Houston women is suing an airline company for PTSD caused by turbulance and the courts are allowing it.Ill take my chances with non aggressively named ammo.I dont trust jury's or judges.
Arguing that you are using some exotic, bizarre ammo that goes through houses and army tanks...might have a small chance on affecting the outcome of a case, but that is not the case here. We are talking about a marketing campaign. Shootings are usually pretty easy cases to determine whether they are justified or not.I guess you could be right but it does paint you in a certain light that in itself would hopefully not be enough to make someone judge stupidly.But arguing that its the same as other ammo isn't always going to fly.If you take the same jeans, basketball jersey and baseball hat not to mention neck-less,oversize the pants hang em off my butt wear the hat sideways and people get a very different opinion of who I might be.
"This individual was using an Assault rifle loaded with rounds marketed to destroy the living dead. What kind of person would think this was a reasonable device for self-defense?" Im not scared of tools or names, but I wouldn't be judging myself this world is full of stupid people.
I know I havent done the research to know if this type of naming of a self defense product could be harmfull to a lawsuit and Im not a lawyer .So in this case im ignorant so I shall stick with whats worked before plain old 556 rounds for me.
OH ! my wife just mentioned at the end of the video Hornady even states that it is not to be used on Human Beings!
Hornady Robber Stoppers?