I happen to have a Pride Fowler Rapid Reticle for 300blk (RRE003) that is currently surplus to my requirements. Comes with rings, box, papers.
If you'd like to research it & get back to me we can probably make a deal.
Pride Fowler Rapid Reticle Evolution Rifle Scope 30mm Tube 1.25-4x
None of them are true 1x no matter what they advertise it as. It's impossible through a magnified lens. 1.25x is about right even for the ones that claim to be 1-4.Appreciate the quick reply, but looking for a true 1x for lowest power setting.
None of them are true 1x no matter what they advertise it as. It's impossible through a magnified lens. 1.25x is about right even for the ones that claim to be 1-4.
Looks like I was a good boy...I asked Santa for a SWFA SSHD 1-4
We'll have to see if I was good this year.
Haha, the badger scope rings and NFA stamp for the can add up to more than the rifle cost me.I've never seen a handi rifle like that. Pretty cool.
Bout as loud as a staple gun.I believe it. I bet it's quiet.
That is not true at all. Maybe a few years ago but not today. My swfa 1-6 is a true 1x and my razor 1-6 looks damn near like a .75 at real close ranges. The Swarovski z6i, mark 6 and most of the other popular higher end 1-X are true 1x. My 1-4 PST to my eyes is a true 1x as well it just doesn't have the giant eye box my razor does.None of them are true 1x no matter what they advertise it as. It's impossible through a magnified lens. 1.25x is about right even for the ones that claim to be 1-4.
Please show me where this scientific proof is because myself and thousands of 3 gun shooters completely disagree with you. Like I said a few years ago that was true when we were barely getting out of the 4x erector designs but it is no longer a problem. Why do you think companies like leupold have scopes they say are 1.25-X and scopes that are 1-X? Because some designs can't get to a true 1x and others can. Please stop spreading bullshit.There is no such thing as true 1x on a variable magnification scope. Your scopes may seem true 1x but it's not.