Gun Control a Major Objective for 2nd Obama Term |
Published August 25, 2011 | By Dsparil
According to John Bolton, Barrack Obama is playing the waiting game with gun control. The stage is being set for a massive power-grab in Washington D.C. as part of an effort to push a U.N. Arms Trade Treaty into the gun safes of American citizens. Most people think that the term “arms” refers to things like tanks, missiles and the like. The truth is, the United Nations is claiming that the aim of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty is to prevent not only armed conflicts between nations but also terrorism.
It looks George Soros and his pet President are waiting for Obama’s second term before really going through with a wave of political destruction and power-grabbing in America. Looks like they want to first make sure the economy slowly continues to deteriorate.
The 2nd Amendment in the United States is an equalizer for its citizens. It serves four purposes:
1. Sustenance. Simple enough. Yup, hunting.
2. Self Defense. It provides an individual with a fighting chance against members of the criminal element. A firearm serves as an equalizer.
3. Defense of one’s nation. This requires military firearms, not daddy’s .30-30. The idea was for the United States government and the state governments to very quickly assemble a military based on conscription should the nation ever be attacked. It wasn’t until World War 1 that the United States really had its first true standing permanent army. The civil war saw the emergence of an army but it quickly minimized itself after the war.
4. The final reason was to overthrow the federal government when it became tyrannical. Thomas Jefferson even said it was only a matter of time before it became a tyranny again. He openly stated that it would require the force arms to overthrow it.
Gun control today, as it is, is like mafioso racketeering. People who originally had the right to bear arms any time had the means to defend themselves effectively and immediately against crime. When the regulation of bearing arms in the states first came into effect it left the people at the mercy of armed criminals. The mafiosos send “Guido” to the local restaurant insisting that they need to pay money for “protection” against bad elements. The business initially refuses and the Mafia henchmen come back later and either blow up the business or burn it down. Other businesses see this and give in to the intimidation because they have no way to defend themselves. They pay hard-earned money to the henchmen and after left in peace.
The government does the same thing using the general criminal element as their own personal “Guido.” They disarm the people under the claim that gun control will help reduce crime and keep them safer. They let it sit for a while, leaving the people defenseless at the mercy of thugs and crime increases. The criminal element victimizes the people on the street because their right to arms was stripped down and it made them easy targets. The government later comes in claiming something has to be done and will adamanantly deny that gun control was the cause of the increase in crime. They claim it must have been the availability of guns (look at the situation with Mexico right now). They demonize the idea of gun ownership during the increase in crime then propose an increase in law enforcement which gains public support from the ignorant. The downside to it is an increase in taxation for protection. In other words, the people are being deprived of their financial assets in exchange for protection against the criminal element of society. It’s costing them money on a yearly basis for safety when, originally, they had it completely free under the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution (price of the gun and ammunition being the exception, of course). Increased law enforcement has also never been nearly as effective as an armed citizen; it’s a fact.
Under Warren v. D.C., it was ruled in the Supreme Court that American law enforcement actually has zero responsibility to protect the individual citizen. What’s that? Can’t own a gun in D.C.? Police response time too long? Too bad. Gun Control is nothing more than a power-grabbing racketeering scam. It forces people to be completely at the government’s mercy and also gives the government and excuse to take more money from the people. Statistically-speaking, Washington D.C. was found to be one of the most dangerous cities to live in America right next to Chicago, IL. Both cities are notorious for the prohibition of firearms by law-abiding citizens.
Now the United Nations is wanting to do this on a global scale. Increased taxation to provide a “service” for something that is originally free to everyone. A lot of people falsely believe that the U.S. is subservient to international treaties. Not true. International treaties that curtail the rights of the American citizen are null and void in this nation. The government is going to to continue to try and hoodwink the American people until we wake up one day with roadblocks on every corner and every single right regulated out of existence. They’re going to use every excuse possible to do it. Whether it’s Mexico’s civil war, domestic violence, the prevention of war itself or maintaining government integrity. People tend to forget, the United Nations assembly is NOT composed of duly elected people. They are, for the most part, appointed.
Published August 25, 2011 | By Dsparil
According to John Bolton, Barrack Obama is playing the waiting game with gun control. The stage is being set for a massive power-grab in Washington D.C. as part of an effort to push a U.N. Arms Trade Treaty into the gun safes of American citizens. Most people think that the term “arms” refers to things like tanks, missiles and the like. The truth is, the United Nations is claiming that the aim of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty is to prevent not only armed conflicts between nations but also terrorism.
It looks George Soros and his pet President are waiting for Obama’s second term before really going through with a wave of political destruction and power-grabbing in America. Looks like they want to first make sure the economy slowly continues to deteriorate.
The 2nd Amendment in the United States is an equalizer for its citizens. It serves four purposes:
1. Sustenance. Simple enough. Yup, hunting.
2. Self Defense. It provides an individual with a fighting chance against members of the criminal element. A firearm serves as an equalizer.
3. Defense of one’s nation. This requires military firearms, not daddy’s .30-30. The idea was for the United States government and the state governments to very quickly assemble a military based on conscription should the nation ever be attacked. It wasn’t until World War 1 that the United States really had its first true standing permanent army. The civil war saw the emergence of an army but it quickly minimized itself after the war.
4. The final reason was to overthrow the federal government when it became tyrannical. Thomas Jefferson even said it was only a matter of time before it became a tyranny again. He openly stated that it would require the force arms to overthrow it.
Gun control today, as it is, is like mafioso racketeering. People who originally had the right to bear arms any time had the means to defend themselves effectively and immediately against crime. When the regulation of bearing arms in the states first came into effect it left the people at the mercy of armed criminals. The mafiosos send “Guido” to the local restaurant insisting that they need to pay money for “protection” against bad elements. The business initially refuses and the Mafia henchmen come back later and either blow up the business or burn it down. Other businesses see this and give in to the intimidation because they have no way to defend themselves. They pay hard-earned money to the henchmen and after left in peace.
The government does the same thing using the general criminal element as their own personal “Guido.” They disarm the people under the claim that gun control will help reduce crime and keep them safer. They let it sit for a while, leaving the people defenseless at the mercy of thugs and crime increases. The criminal element victimizes the people on the street because their right to arms was stripped down and it made them easy targets. The government later comes in claiming something has to be done and will adamanantly deny that gun control was the cause of the increase in crime. They claim it must have been the availability of guns (look at the situation with Mexico right now). They demonize the idea of gun ownership during the increase in crime then propose an increase in law enforcement which gains public support from the ignorant. The downside to it is an increase in taxation for protection. In other words, the people are being deprived of their financial assets in exchange for protection against the criminal element of society. It’s costing them money on a yearly basis for safety when, originally, they had it completely free under the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution (price of the gun and ammunition being the exception, of course). Increased law enforcement has also never been nearly as effective as an armed citizen; it’s a fact.
Under Warren v. D.C., it was ruled in the Supreme Court that American law enforcement actually has zero responsibility to protect the individual citizen. What’s that? Can’t own a gun in D.C.? Police response time too long? Too bad. Gun Control is nothing more than a power-grabbing racketeering scam. It forces people to be completely at the government’s mercy and also gives the government and excuse to take more money from the people. Statistically-speaking, Washington D.C. was found to be one of the most dangerous cities to live in America right next to Chicago, IL. Both cities are notorious for the prohibition of firearms by law-abiding citizens.
Now the United Nations is wanting to do this on a global scale. Increased taxation to provide a “service” for something that is originally free to everyone. A lot of people falsely believe that the U.S. is subservient to international treaties. Not true. International treaties that curtail the rights of the American citizen are null and void in this nation. The government is going to to continue to try and hoodwink the American people until we wake up one day with roadblocks on every corner and every single right regulated out of existence. They’re going to use every excuse possible to do it. Whether it’s Mexico’s civil war, domestic violence, the prevention of war itself or maintaining government integrity. People tend to forget, the United Nations assembly is NOT composed of duly elected people. They are, for the most part, appointed.
