I wish. Looks to be a gi model of some sortKimber?
I wish. Looks to be a gi model of some sortKimber?
Damn - I thought you were talking about a woman.I would daily that.
Ahh, that IS a sad story laddie.After some research on cool gunsite, I think it is a Union Switch and Signal mbecause of the CO on the rollmark. Which makes the sin even greater.
Pfft - I'd shoot it. GI rear sight - might not shoot it well, but I'd still do it.
Pfft - I'd shoot it. GI rear sight - might not shoot it well, but I'd still do it.
Looks like all of the notches/groves/disfigurements have been smoothed, so you shouldn't have any blood on
your hands when racking the slide.
Hey GZ,I'll have blood on my hands when I get ahold of the bubba who did that...
Hey GZ,
Take a look at the early '60's "Bullseye Guns" done by the Air Force & Army team armorers...(think it was before the "AMU" was)??
Mr. Giles comes to mind....
View attachment 408139
They worked with "surplus" guns (I know the bottom one is a Model 52....the upper one is in 38 special ) with what was on hand.
Almost all were exceptionally accurate...
Fellow I shot Bullseye with had a Giles 38 Special that looked real similar to this next pic...notice the "stipling' on the front strap.
View attachment 408140
The .38s were mid-range wadcutters where the bullet was set back to almost flush with the case rim. There was also a .38 AMU but it was briefly used. The sights on the colt don't look right for an AMU gun. I am pretty sure that the Colt serial number is a commercial number. AMU conversions, as I understand it, were done on GI issued guns, Ithicas, Remington Rands, Colt etc.Hey GZ,
Take a look at the early '60's "Bullseye Guns" done by the Air Force & Army team armorers...(think it was before the "AMU" was)??
Mr. Giles comes to mind....
View attachment 408139
They worked with "surplus" guns (I know the bottom one is a Model 52....the upper one is in 38 special ) with what was on hand.
Almost all were exceptionally accurate...
Fellow I shot Bullseye with had a Giles 38 Special that looked real similar to this next pic...notice the "stipling' on the front strap.
View attachment 408140
Always be wary of sidewinders.
Looks like it used to be an 80%.Probably no stock parts and reloads . Then blame the gun is defective