How so? It clearly states no firearms allowed. Is there something in the new law that says a licensed individual can carry unless a sign specifically bans licensed concealed carry? Keep in mind, this is for AFTER the September 1st switch. Their goal is to ban firearms period. "A person may not enter this property with a firearm." It doesn't get much clearer than that.
Just curious, do you have an LTC?Well the joke will be on them, because I read the email on my cousins phone, and the big boss clearly stated they only want law enforcement to be able to carry in their restaurants. They believe the 30.05 sign "no firearms allowed" will cover them even for someone with a permit.
Just curious, do you have an LTC?
Well the joke will be on them, because I read the email on my cousins phone, and the big boss clearly stated they only want law enforcement to be able to carry in their restaurants. They believe the 30.05 sign "no firearms allowed" will cover them even for someone with a permit.
They got them in Arizona too. I'll let the folks here know too.
Are there stickers we can slap on these places like "This establishment doesn't care about your family's safety" or done such? Their food is bland and expensive, like a higher tier Panera anyways.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
I don't see that specified. My doctors office and separate hospital says no firearms allowed, period. As I understand it, a business or any residence can simply place a paper towel or piece of cardboard by the door saying no firearms allowed, doesn't have to be a fancy sign.Only if you don't have an LTC.
That may be correct for permitless carry (and I say may be correct) but for LTC must have 30.06/07 signage.I don't see that specified. My doctors office and separate hospital says no firearms allowed, period. As I understand it, a business or any residence can simply place a paper towel or piece of cardboard by the door saying no firearms allowed, doesn't have to be a fancy sign.
Permit less carry requires 30.05 signThat may be correct for permitless carry (and I say may be correct) but for LTC must have 30.06/07 signage.
The signage for permit less carry is still up for debate. The legislation may be interpreted to allow a gun buster sign. The distinction comes with the words “may” instead of “shall” in the bill itself. AG will need to guide us. For LTC the legislation requires exact wording.Permit less carry requires 30.05 sign
What's wrong w/Tomball pawn?
The signage for permit less carry is still up for debate. The legislation may be interpreted to allow a gun buster sign. The distinction comes with the words “may” instead of “shall” in the bill itself. AG will need to guide us. For LTC the legislation requires exact wording.
Excellent points. Hopefully my letter to the AG will bring clarification.Signage has always been up for (friendly) debate, but at the last 25 years of practical application of the 30.05 trespass law seems to indicate that a generic sign would also require oral notification. As I said in the other thread, the word "may" that TLS is so hung up on indicates that IF the location wants to provide written notice particularly that entry with a firearm is barred, the specified sign is how they MAY do it. If they don't do it that way then it is quite doubtful they have in fact provided written notice (that your entry is barred, SPECIFICALLY if you are carrying a firearm). Otherwise, they MAY use purple paint marks or a no trespassing sign, so that nobody may enter.