Besides, how does he take a whiz?
Curiously, possessing flame throwers isn't restricted, unlike firearms. They fall outside of the "destructive device", "firearm", and even "any other weapon" categories that the ATF has jurisdiction over.wow i see a jail sentence in that guys future, really cool toy though.
Besides, how does he take a whiz?
Curiously, possessing flame throwers isn't restricted, unlike firearms. They fall outside of the "destructive device", "firearm", and even "any other weapon" categories that the ATF has jurisdiction over.
I think "firearm" is the perfect way to describe this thing.
It doesn't have to be an either/or decision - why not have this and the .45?
Website got 404'd. Dead link.