People perceive guns as a threat too. Doesn't mean they have legal recourse if they choose too take certain actions against someone for carrying.
There are risks in everything we do. But depending on the situation, there is recourse when the risk is due to someone's action being taken against a person taking part in an activity. That is generally not ok. And in many cases the actor will be required to make the situation right, would suck to illegally blast a drone only to be ordered to replace it. Salt on an open wound type of deal.
Let's say your car breaks down and the only place you have to pull off the road puts your vehicle on my property. Do I have any right to set it on fire? It is on my property after all.
Sent from my HAL 9000
There are risks in everything we do. But depending on the situation, there is recourse when the risk is due to someone's action being taken against a person taking part in an activity. That is generally not ok. And in many cases the actor will be required to make the situation right, would suck to illegally blast a drone only to be ordered to replace it. Salt on an open wound type of deal.
Let's say your car breaks down and the only place you have to pull off the road puts your vehicle on my property. Do I have any right to set it on fire? It is on my property after all.
Sent from my HAL 9000