You missed the target. It is called "banned"Damn. Was just about to learn how to say his/her/it's name.
Arr kay day
Arr key dee
Arr ka dy
It's Russian, so where's the "3" and backwards N?
You missed the target. It is called "banned"Damn. Was just about to learn how to say his/her/it's name.
Arr kay day
Arr key dee
Arr ka dy
It's Russian, so where's the "3" and backwards N?
I thought it was pronounced banned former member. Apparently it was ree tar ded.You're looking for Аркадий?
There's no "e" in Arkady or Аркадий, so no "3" for you, comrade. And it's Are-CAW-dee.
Not enough emphasis on “Reeeeeeeeeeee”I thought it was pronounced banned former member. Apparently it was ree tar ded.
Here you go:Damn. Was just about to learn how to say his/her/it's name.
Arr kay day
Arr key dee
Arr ka dy
It's Russian, so where's the "3" and backwards N?
We can say whatever about communists though. Because communists aren’t people
We can say whatever about communists though. Because communists aren’t people
Unfortunately, words are enough to eradicate the problem.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Anyone find it weird that the left is obsessed with Trumps color.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
They will always be obsessed with Trump reason they fabricate new stories every week then fall back to the old ones. The man hasn't been found quilty of any.
I'm glad to see that the communist got himself banned
Bet he is already back hiding in the weeds and deciding who he will be. He did a fair job on this run of hiding his prior iteration but slipped up a few times.He'll be back. He always is.
Bet he is already back hiding in the weeds and deciding who he will be. He did a fair job on this run of hiding his prior iteration but slipped up a few times.
All of what you said and he had several distinct phrases and sentences he used to make his points. I will keep them close to the vest, as he is most likely reading this now.His "debate" style didn't change - make assertions with no proof, then demand proof of anyone who contradicts him. Then offer proof that either only implies what he's stating as fact, or that comes from the most biased source possible. He then ignores any sources presented that contradict his point and continues as before.