Military Camp

selecting a defensive handgun with "safety" and "reliability" in mind

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • billtool

    TGT Addict
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 16, 2008
    4,148
    96
    The Wooldlands
    for ccw I recommend a striker fired pistol with no manual safety. Walther, Glock, S&W, Sig, S.A. and CZ are all good contenders. My favorites being the Glock and Walther. 9mm is always a great choice but .45Auto isn't bad. Stick to those brands, stop reading articles and go finger **** some toys. If it's not comfortable you won't carry it. I'll leave you with a quote from my buddy Karl, "Walther... the gun thats hugs you back!"
    Unless the Walther is a CCP - then it hugs you back and burns the crap out of your hand after 100 rounds as a result of it's venting hot gas onto the frame. Danged if it isn't accurate as heck and soft shooting though - I'll give it that.
    Hurley's Gold
     

    no2gates

    These are not the droids you're looking for.
    Lifetime Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Aug 31, 2013
    6,126
    96
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Unless the Walther is a CCP - then it hugs you back and burns the crap out of your hand after 100 rounds as a result of it's venting hot gas onto the frame. Danged if it isn't accurate as heck and soft shooting though - I'll give it that.
    Yeah, I've got one too. Nice shooting, pain in the ass to takedown, and gets damn hot after a few magazines through it.
     

    HKaltwasser

    Well-Known
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Unless the Walther is a CCP - then it hugs you back and burns the crap out of your hand after 100 rounds as a result of it's venting hot gas onto the frame. Danged if it isn't accurate as heck and soft shooting though - I'll give it that.

    Ah, so it did take this trait from the P7. I wondered if it had the heating problem too since it operates with a very similar piston system.

    No doubt the P7 is a easy safe in to action gun.


     
    Last edited:

    Ioannes

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 12, 2019
    355
    46
    US
    My wife has a P365 that's never gone off without her pulling the trigger. Light or not, if you keep your booger hook off the bang switch, it won't go bang. Quality kydex holster like Garrett Industries that covers the trigger and you're good to go.

    The bg not knowing how to work a safety is an interesting point, though.

    Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
     

    d_holliday

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 3, 2020
    111
    11
    Fort Hood, Tx
    P365 inanimate with a very light trigger that perhaps some may pocket carry without a holster? It was the p320 that is claimed to go off while holstered. I have a full size P320 that has gone back to Sig for the "recall" but I would not carry that as a defensive weapon. It is a range gun. Shoots good but I don't trust it to carry.

    What the man in the video is worried about is a finger "accidentally" contacting the trigger as the gun is drawn from a holster, pocket, purse, handbag or waistpack thus possibly causing the gun to "accidentally" go off while drawing. There is also the possibility of "accidentally" contacting the trigger while the gun is being holstered or being handled while a round is chambered. When people, even experienced and well-trained firearms handlers, are in a hurry or under stress, they can get careless. It's a human reality. "Accidental" handgun discharges are common even in police departments. I, like the old man in the video, feel a gun with a relatively light trigger and short pull should have a thumb safety for prudence. A double-action revolver with rested hammer can get away with no thumb safety due to its inherent long and heavy trigger.
     

    Glenn B

    Retired & Loving It
    TGT Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 5, 2019
    7,494
    96
    Texarkana - Across The Border
    I have heard it shouted and I've heard it preached, "There is no firearms safety like safe gun handling habits."

    This gentleman, GunBlue490, on YouTube has a whole video series on firearms:



    He seems old, wise and sensible.

    This latest video on (why not buy a Glock?) Well, Herr Gaston Glock, forgot to put a stupid safety on the thing even! Mr. 490 claims that the thumb safety has saved the lives of many a policeman who carried an auto on duty such as the venerable old Colt 45 Govt. Model. The Glock has a so-called safe action but there is nothing in the world from stopping a human finger from pulling that trigger back to fire at will or unintentionally. That plastic flipper built into the trigger won't stop that. The striker-fired Glock has a very spongy but short trigger and not much pull in weight. The double-action revolver has much more trigger weight and a much longer pull length and that is the virtue of it's built-in safety while the hammer is resting.

    I have been contemplating getting a new M&P 9 Shield EZ from Smith & Wesson in 9mm. I have two choices from Springfield, MA in this model....thumb safety or no thumb safety. I was thinking along the lines of no thumb safety for speed and ease but firearms safety might be seriously compromised still. The man in the video claims that with proper training, a thumb safety can be taken off in no time at all while drawing. I will have to do more research and see how easy Smith thumb safeties are to take off in a hurry. I never had any problems with the thumb safety operation on any of the 3 Colt Govt. Model 45's I've owned in the past. Now, I want a sensible rather-compact conceal-carry gun. Some thumb safeties can be stubby and hard to get a thumb hold on in a flash.

    One other caveat I'm lately discovering about the Smith Shield: that "catch/slide release" on the port side of the slide is not actually made to be operated by a human firing-hand thumb as with a Glock or with a 45. Releasing the locked-back slide is a two-handed operation... with slide in locked position, pull the slide all the way back with the non-firing hand and let it pop into battery to fire the next loaded magazine. You should hear the catch click to be release when the slide goes all the way back.

    What are your thoughts on selecting a concealed-carry handgun with regard to safety, reliability and your personal ability to effectively and safely operate the firearm in an emergency situation? Are there situations where having to use the other hand to release the slide might be a handicap? In most defensive situations by American citizens, rarely do more than three shots have to be firered. The Shield EZ holds 8 rounds in the magazine so it's very rare that that slide might have to be released with the non-firing hand in the heat of battle because the second mag had to be loaded. Ideally this gun would be carried in a holster or waistpack locked-and-cocked, full mag loaded in gun and with one already in the chamber: IOW, Condition One...flip down the thumb safety to go to Condition Zero.
    You certainly know how to at least try to get folks over to your point of view with your leading voluminous post. The thing is, in your first paragraph, bashing Glocks, you get it absolutely wrong about the Glock trigger pull if only because you can order a trigger for it that is just like a revolver on permanent double action only, it's called the NY trigger. Try one sometime.

    Then again, your brain and bodily control of at least one body part, your booger picker, are the best - the absolute best - things toward firearms safety.
     

    zackmars

    Free 1911 refinishing
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 4, 2015
    5,781
    96
    Texas
    You certainly know how to at least try to get folks over to your point of view with your leading voluminous post. The thing is, in your first paragraph, bashing Glocks, you get it absolutely wrong about the Glock trigger pull if only because you can order a trigger for it that is just like a revolver on permanent double action only, it's called the NY trigger. Try one sometime.

    Then again, your brain and bodily control of at least one body part, your booger picker, are the best - the absolute best - things toward firearms safety.


    The other part about glock he gets wrong is the entire purpose of the "safe action trigger". It is nothing more than a passive safety, like a transfer bar on a revolver so you can hammer down on a live round, or an OOB safety
     

    zackmars

    Free 1911 refinishing
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 4, 2015
    5,781
    96
    Texas
    Holster choice is also very important, solid retention, covers the trigger, sides that maintian their shape, and a locking mechanism that doesnt require you to use your trigger finger
     

    Frank59

    Wheel Gunner
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 14, 2018
    1,897
    96
    San Angelo
    Apparently there are reports of holstered Sig p320 discharging and an upcoming lawsuit. Paul Harrell is recommending that the Sig p365 should be purchased with the optional safety because of the light trigger pull. The finger off of the trigger may not be as safe as everyone thinks.
    The trigger weight on my P365 is 5.1....A little bit higher than the others i carry
     

    satx78247

    Member, Emeritus
    Emeritus - "Texas Proud"
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 23, 2014
    8,479
    96
    78208
    I have heard it shouted and I've heard it preached, "There is no firearms safety like safe gun handling habits."

    This gentleman, GunBlue490, on YouTube has a whole video series on firearms:



    He seems old, wise and sensible.

    This latest video on (why not buy a Glock?) Well, Herr Gaston Glock, forgot to put a stupid safety on the thing even! Mr. 490 claims that the thumb safety has saved the lives of many a policeman who carried an auto on duty such as the venerable old Colt 45 Govt. Model. The Glock has a so-called safe action but there is nothing in the world from stopping a human finger from pulling that trigger back to fire at will or unintentionally. That plastic flipper built into the trigger won't stop that. The striker-fired Glock has a very spongy but short trigger and not much pull in weight. The double-action revolver has much more trigger weight and a much longer pull length and that is the virtue of it's built-in safety while the hammer is resting.

    I have been contemplating getting a new M&P 9 Shield EZ from Smith & Wesson in 9mm. I have two choices from Springfield, MA in this model....thumb safety or no thumb safety. I was thinking along the lines of no thumb safety for speed and ease but firearms safety might be seriously compromised still. The man in the video claims that with proper training, a thumb safety can be taken off in no time at all while drawing. I will have to do more research and see how easy Smith thumb safeties are to take off in a hurry. I never had any problems with the thumb safety operation on any of the 3 Colt Govt. Model 45's I've owned in the past. Now, I want a sensible rather-compact conceal-carry gun. Some thumb safeties can be stubby and hard to get a thumb hold on in a flash.

    One other caveat I'm lately discovering about the Smith Shield: that "catch/slide release" on the port side of the slide is not actually made to be operated by a human firing-hand thumb as with a Glock or with a 45. Releasing the locked-back slide is a two-handed operation... with slide in locked position, pull the slide all the way back with the non-firing hand and let it pop into battery to fire the next loaded magazine. You should hear the catch click to be release when the slide goes all the way back.

    What are your thoughts on selecting a concealed-carry handgun with regard to safety, reliability and your personal ability to effectively and safely operate the firearm in an emergency situation? Are there situations where having to use the other hand to release the slide might be a handicap? In most defensive situations by American citizens, rarely do more than three shots have to be firered. The Shield EZ holds 8 rounds in the magazine so it's very rare that that slide might have to be released with the non-firing hand in the heat of battle because the second mag had to be loaded. Ideally this gun would be carried in a holster or waistpack locked-and-cocked, full mag loaded in gun and with one already in the chamber: IOW, Condition One...flip down the thumb safety to go to Condition Zero.


    d_holliday,

    Personally, IF you are looking for a "safe to carry" concealable defensive handgun, it is difficult to beat a S&W K-frame revolver in.38SPL or .357 MAG, especially for a "newbie" to EDC.
    OR
    Most any of the quality made SA/DA 9mm handguns, that has an EXTERNAL/MANUAL SAFETY.
    (While not quite as ""idiot proof" as a DA revolver, I believe that SA/DA pistols like my EDC, a ZIGANA K in 9x19mm is CLOSE, as those pistols have a LONG revolver-like DA trigger squeeze, if the safety lever is in the OFF position BUT can also be carried cocked & locked like a Colt's GM.)

    just my OPINION, satx
     
    Top Bottom